Re-definition found for builtin function

[Borda]

Before submitting

• Was this discussed/approved via a Github issue? (no need for typos and docs improvements)
• Did you read the contributor guideline, Pull Request section?
• Did you make sure to update the docs?
• Did you write any new necessary tests?

What does this PR do?

Fixes # (issue).

PR review

Anyone in the community is free to review the PR once the tests have passed.
If we didn't discuss your PR in Github issues there's a high chance it will not be merged.

Did you have fun?

Make sure you had fun coding 🙃

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Merging #325 (32bf323) into master (441e116) will not change coverage.
The diff coverage is 100.00%.

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master     #325   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   96.56%   96.56%           
=======================================
  Files         111      111           
  Lines        3547     3547           
=======================================
  Hits         3425     3425           
  Misses        122      122           

Flag	Coverage Δ
Linux	75.71% <14.28%> (ø)
Windows	75.71% <14.28%> (ø)
cpu	96.50% <100.00%> (ø)
gpu	96.46% <100.00%> (ø)
macOS	96.50% <100.00%> (ø)
pytest	96.56% <100.00%> (ø)
python3.6	95.62% <100.00%> (ø)
python3.8	96.50% <100.00%> (ø)
python3.9	96.39% <100.00%> (ø)
torch1.3.1	95.62% <100.00%> (ø)
torch1.4.0	95.71% <100.00%> (ø)
torch1.9.0	96.39% <100.00%> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

Impacted Files	Coverage Δ
torchmetrics/collections.py	98.87% <100.00%> (ø)
torchmetrics/image/fid.py	82.55% <100.00%> (ø)

---

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 441e116...32bf323. Read the comment docs.