Removed input_order from text unit tests

[jscottcronin]

What does this PR do?

Historical Work:

The following issue was created to align input order for preds and targets in the text (NLG) module: #686
The following PR was merged with the fix: #696

Fixes #704
The work in this PR removes references to input_order in the torchmetrics.tests.text.helpers._class_test and torchmetrics.tests.text.helpers._functional_test. All unit tests also remove this parameter from calls to these methods. All unit tests are passing locally.

Before submitting

• Was this discussed/approved via a Github issue? (no need for typos and docs improvements)
• Did you read the contributor guideline, Pull Request section?
• Did you make sure to update the docs?
• Did you write any new necessary tests?

PR review

Anyone in the community is free to review the PR once the tests have passed.
If we didn't discuss your PR in Github issues there's a high chance it will not be merged.

Did you have fun?

Make sure you had fun coding 🙃

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Merging #717 (0480dfc) into master (4c2106b) will not change coverage.
The diff coverage is n/a.

@@          Coverage Diff          @@
##           master   #717   +/-   ##
=====================================
  Coverage      95%    95%           
=====================================
  Files         166    166           
  Lines        6424   6424           
=====================================
  Hits         6117   6117           
  Misses        307    307           

[jscottcronin]

@Borda - Any thoughts on why codecov shows a loss of 22% coverage when I'm fully up to date with master? Also, do we know why some of the test environments fail in CI/CD? Here is an example:

[Borda]

@Borda - Any thoughts on why codecov shows a loss of 22% coverage when I'm fully up to date with master?

you just need to wait until all tests are finished, mainly then GPU tests

Also, do we know why some of the test environments fail in CI/CD? Here is an example:

there is something wrong with the package we depend on, not sure what... @quancs mind have know?

[stancld]

LGTM!

[quancs]

there is something wrong with the package we depend on, not sure what... @quancs mind have know?

Seems something wrong with the numpy version.

[Borda]

there is something wrong with the package we depend on, not sure what... @quancs mind have know?

Seems something wrong with the numpy version.

we can try to reinstall or do you have some specific version we shall use?

[quancs]

@Borda I checked the differences of installed packages in the test environment. Below are the differences. I will open another PR to verify which is the problem. ^^