Voting Power Contract Implementation #42
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
matjazv
force-pushed
the
40-voting-power-contract
branch
3 times, most recently
from
a287223
to
f934245
Compare
AndreasKendziorra
requested changes
Feb 19, 2024
AndreasKendziorra
requested changes
Feb 20, 2024
matjazv
force-pushed
the
40-voting-power-contract
branch
from
a71230f
to
c09ad01
Compare
AndreasKendziorra
requested changes
Feb 23, 2024
Phanco
reviewed
Feb 23, 2024
matjazv
force-pushed
the
40-voting-power-contract
branch
from
9c8d040
to
b5f5df2
Compare
|
I needed to rebase this branch with |
AndreasKendziorra
approved these changes
Feb 26, 2024
Phanco
approved these changes
Feb 27, 2024
Array for LockingPosition is used as a function parameter
matjazv
force-pushed
the
40-voting-power-contract
branch
from
b5f5df2
to
dff279b
Compare
|
|
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
What was the problem?
This PR resolves #40.
How was it solved?
How was it tested?
New unit tests were implemented.