-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 30
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
GH-692: Allow UI to configure --min-hops during runtime #316
Conversation
…new SetConfigurationMessage
…s name inside ConfigurationChange
…s name inside ConfigurationChange
…rator/configurator.rs
…cause it's a dead code
…hops_database_issue
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Resume at configurator.rs:889 green.
* GH-692: add the public constant DEFAULT_TRANSACT_TIMEOUT_MILLIS for the production code * GH-692: add another constant for the tests * GH-692: reduce total number of nodes for the min hops data routing test * GH-692: change the comment for the multinode test * GH-692: replace the constant for db_patch_size and use the different name everywhere * GH-692: put code back for NewPasswordMessage * GH-692: minor changes * GH-692: add error logging when the UiSetConfigurationRequest causes an error * GH-692: test fix and remove todo * GH-692: fix test set_configuration_command_throws_err_for_invalid_arg * GH-692: remove UpdateNewPassword variant * GH-692: add better error msg in case the assert statement fails
@@ -63,11 +63,15 @@ const SET_CONFIGURATION_ABOUT: &str = | |||
const START_BLOCK_HELP: &str = | |||
"Ordinal number of the Ethereum block where scanning for transactions will start."; | |||
|
|||
pub fn set_configurationify<'a>(shared_schema_arg: Arg<'a, 'a>) -> Arg<'a, 'a> { | |||
shared_schema_arg.takes_value(true).required(false) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I don't think the .required(false)
hurts anything, but I also think it's not necessary.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I've removed it. 👍
No description provided.