-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 31
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Questions Regarding RAT Tool and Contig Processing #133
Comments
Hi Nhu, |
Hi Shea, No, I haven't found a solution to the error yet. Best, Nhu |
I'm trying the latest version 6.0.1 and will let you know if that works for me. |
Thank you very much. I posted my question on Biostars, but no one replied. |
v6.0.1 still has this error. |
Thank you for your message. In my case, I used Kraken2 to classify reads, but it's actually not ideal because the classification percentage is very low. |
Hi there, |
Hello Thauptfeld, Thank you for your response. Here is my BAM file,
and this is from the read files.
I look forward to hearing from you. Best, Nhu |
Hi All, Cheers, |
Hello Thauptfeld, Thank you for considering my feedback. Yesterday, I tried your updated code, but there are still some issues.
Sincerely, Nhu |
Hi Nhu, the issue with the run seems to be that in the read files, the read id's have a /1 at the end (or a /2 in the reverse file I assume), which is removed during the mapping. So, in the bam file they don't have the /1 at the end. Therefore, RAT is looking for a read id that doesn't exist in the read file. RAT is supposed to be able to handle this for '/1' and '_1', so I'll have to check what is going on. Will let you know. |
Hello Team,
Thank you for the wonderful tool. However, I have two questions:
When I run
RAT,
it gives an error related to the reads with the following message. From what I understand, myFASTQ
headers must be present in the contigs. My contigs were generated byMEGAHIT
, and they only have names like>k127_10000
, without anyFASTQ
names. What should I do in this case?When I run
RAT
, it requires me to performCAT.contig2classification.txt
first, but your tutorial does not mention that.Does this
RAT
method (mapping reads to contigs) require re-running the deduplication step to accurately calculate relative abundance?Thank you and please assist,
Nhu
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: