-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.3k
Redesign mail categories to use label-based filtering instead of search queries #1902
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
MrgSub
merged 1 commit into
staging
from
ZERORedesign_mail_categories_to_use_label-based_filtering_instead_of_search_queries
Aug 4, 2025
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
|---|---|---|
| @@ -1 +1 @@ | ||
| pnpm lint-staged | ||
| pnpm dlx oxlint@1.9.0 --deny-warnings | ||
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
💡 Verification agent
🧩 Analysis chain
Fascinating transition to oxlint - let's verify this rocket won't explode on launch.
This is quite the paradigm shift from lint-staged to oxlint. While I appreciate the move toward stricter linting with
--deny-warnings- because warnings are just errors in denial - we need to ensure this doesn't turn every commit into a Mars mission timeline.Key concerns:
@latestLet's run some diagnostics to ensure this pre-commit hook doesn't become a bottleneck:
🏁 Script executed:
Length of output: 1601
Oxlint Pre-commit Hook: Performance & Consistency Check
We’ve verified that oxlint@1.9.0 is available (and is indeed the current “latest”), but the package.json script uses
@latestwhile your Husky hook pins to1.9.0. There’s also no.oxlintrcin the repo, so oxlint will run with defaults, and it will scan ~339 JS/TS files on every commit. Let’s tighten this up:• Align versioning
– Update
.husky/pre-committopnpm dlx oxlint@latest --deny-warningsor pin both scripts to1.9.0for full reproducibility.• Add an oxlint config file
– Create a
.oxlintrc(or equivalent) to ensure consistent rules across CI and local runs.• Plan for scale
– 339 files is fine now, but as the repo grows you may want to revisit staged-only linting or incremental runs to keep commits lightning fast.
Let’s land this rocket without turning commits into interplanetary voyages.
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents