-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 23
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Allow Rails 6.1 #103
Allow Rails 6.1 #103
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
are we testing these changes to the ancillary gemspecs or just merging them?
Just because this does deal with Active Record persistence so directly I'd like to run this through with cross-repo actually using rails 6.1, that way we can fix any issues in this PR |
I'm currently trying this out with rails 6.1 locally with a manual cross repo run. |
In the event you're running several in a batch, it's nice to report on what we're doing and not rely on ENV variables as some could be set via command line. The output looks something like this: ``` Starting cross repo for: test repo: ManageIQ/manageiq-providers-lenovo core repo: ManageIQ/manageiq#21652 gem repo: ManageIQ/inventory_refresh#103 Fetching https://github.com/ManageIQ/manageiq-providers-lenovo/tarball/dfeb7c99963eac29e9eb9f8f2f78ba2c9c3ee866 ```
eaa9096
to
bcea63f
Compare
NOTE I've added rails 6.1 into the test matrix here |
Gemfile
Outdated
@@ -14,4 +14,6 @@ when "5.2" | |||
gem "activerecord", "~>5.2.6" | |||
when "6.0" | |||
gem "activerecord", "~>6.0.4" | |||
when "6.1" | |||
gem "activesupport", "~>6.1.4" |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
gem "activesupport", "~>6.1.4" | |
gem "activerecord", "~>6.1.4" |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think this repo actually uses both activerecord and activesupport, but only declares activerecord as a dependency...it probably should do both, and then also have both here as well.
bcea63f
to
3a9b410
Compare
Checked commit agrare@3a9b410 with ruby 2.6.3, rubocop 1.13.0, haml-lint 0.35.0, and yamllint |
No description provided.