Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Adding support for /api/container_groups #184

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Nov 21, 2017

Conversation

abellotti
Copy link
Member

@abellotti abellotti commented Nov 7, 2017

  • New collection
  • Support GETs and bulk query
  • Support custom_actions
  • Specs added

BZ: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1549658

@miq-bot
Copy link
Member

miq-bot commented Nov 17, 2017

This pull request is not mergeable. Please rebase and repush.

@abellotti abellotti changed the title [WIP] Adding support for /api/container_groups Adding support for /api/container_groups Nov 21, 2017
@abellotti abellotti removed the wip label Nov 21, 2017
@abellotti
Copy link
Member Author

ping @jntullo

- New collection
- Support GETs and bulk query
- Support custom_actions
- Specs added
@miq-bot
Copy link
Member

miq-bot commented Nov 21, 2017

Checked commit abellotti@592efd5 with ruby 2.3.3, rubocop 0.47.1, haml-lint 0.20.0, and yamllint 1.10.0
4 files checked, 0 offenses detected
Everything looks fine. 🏆

Copy link

@jntullo jntullo left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM 👍

@gtanzillo gtanzillo added this to the Sprint 74 Ending Nov 27, 2017 milestone Nov 21, 2017
@gtanzillo gtanzillo merged commit a60c2e6 into ManageIQ:master Nov 21, 2017
@abellotti abellotti deleted the container_groups branch November 22, 2017 14:02
@abellotti
Copy link
Member Author

abellotti commented Mar 1, 2018

Ping @gmcculloug this needs to go to 5.9.1, before I flip the g/yes switch does anything need to go in the model ? More specifically, the custom button support for container_groups comes to mind which was not meant for the G-release. Thanks.

/cc @jntullo @Loicavenel

@jntullo
Copy link

jntullo commented Mar 5, 2018

cc: @bascar

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants