-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 54
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
check if project_id is accessible #23
Conversation
bdb1a82
to
a4ed443
Compare
Checked commit durandom@a4ed443 with ruby 2.2.6, rubocop 0.47.1, and haml-lint 0.20.0 |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This is as best as we can get being limited by ansible/ansible_tower_client_ruby#68 (which may need a overhaul of the way the gem works)
@bdunne you want to take a look? Dont know how far you've got to fix the initial problem in that issue. I still think we should not use the "related" array to create the |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This could also happen at different levels of the API, but either way, this is probably the best way to fix it.
@durandom can you add a "Fine" label? |
@bdunne label added - can you merge here? |
Thanks, no I don't have merge rights here. Maybe @agrare |
Fine backport (to manageiq repo) details:
|
This is similar to ManageIQ/manageiq#14297
and it seems to be still the root cause here ansible/ansible_tower_client_ruby#68
@jameswnl Did we get to the root cause why this happens? Is it because of a mix of Ansible Tower v2 and v3 in the environment?
fixes https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1485414