catalog item accepts remove_resources option #14328
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
@bzwei Cannot apply the following label because they are not recognized: service |
|
@bzwei Looks good. |
bzwei
force-pushed
the
multiple_retirement_eps
branch
from
4cbf62a
to
5183ef0
Compare
|
Checked commit bzwei@5183ef0 with ruby 2.2.6, rubocop 0.47.1, and haml-lint 0.20.0 |
|
Look good. |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Choosing retirement entry is based on
:remove_resourcesoption in theconfig_infohttps://www.pivotaltracker.com/story/show/141500781
@miq-bot assign @gmcculloug
@miq-bot add_label providers/ansible_tower
@miq-bot add_label enhancement
@miq-bot add_label service
@miq-bot add_label euwe/no
@tinaafitz please review