Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fixes tag control multi-value #14382

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Mar 22, 2017
Merged

Fixes tag control multi-value #14382

merged 1 commit into from
Mar 22, 2017

Conversation

d-m-u
Copy link
Contributor

@d-m-u d-m-u commented Mar 17, 2017

Drop-downs have multi-select functionality as of ManageIQ/manageiq-ui-classic#114. This fixes an issue where tag control, which is sub-classed from the same base as drop-down, lacks the necessary method for multiple items on the same field.

Related to ManageIQ/manageiq-ui-classic#729

@gmcculloug
Copy link
Member

@d-m-u Let's get a test around this please.

@miq-bot
Copy link
Member

miq-bot commented Mar 21, 2017

Checked commit d-m-u@e2a0f14 with ruby 2.2.6, rubocop 0.47.1, and haml-lint 0.20.0
2 files checked, 0 offenses detected
Everything looks good. 🏆

@gmcculloug gmcculloug merged commit b9de782 into ManageIQ:master Mar 22, 2017
@gmcculloug gmcculloug added this to the Sprint 57 Ending Mar 27, 2017 milestone Mar 22, 2017
@d-m-u d-m-u deleted the tagControlMultiFix branch March 22, 2017 22:23
@simaishi
Copy link
Contributor

Euwe backport details:

$ git log -1
commit ab0b9c9ae8d9c77bd1636188a280c1c06ec33d1a
Author: Greg McCullough <gmccullo@redhat.com>
Date:   Wed Mar 22 17:49:42 2017 -0400

    Merge pull request #14382 from d-m-u/tagControlMultiFix
    
    Fixes tag control multi-value
    (cherry picked from commit b9de782ab3bd7c0b5d64821f4539b8a777cacefa)
    
    https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1436223

simaishi pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 27, 2017
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants