Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add pretty model name for physical server #15283

Merged

Conversation

mzazrivec
Copy link
Contributor

Before:
physical-server-before

After:
physical-server-after

@chessbyte chessbyte self-assigned this Jun 2, 2017
@mzazrivec mzazrivec force-pushed the add_model_name_for_physical_server branch from f7c4907 to b4d9e56 Compare June 2, 2017 12:59
@@ -886,6 +887,7 @@ en:
OrchestrationTemplateVnfd: VNF Template
ManageIQ::Providers::Vmware::CloudManager::OrchestrationTemplate: vApp Template
PersistentVolume: Persistent Volume
PhysicalServer: Physical Server
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

#15275 is a dup of this PR (merged yesterday)

Although I might have missed adding the entry on L#890.
Do we need it? (since I did not see it for Physical Infrastructure Provider)
If yes, let's keep the PR. Thanks.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@AparnaKarve Yes, it is needed for us being able to translate breadcrumb in physical server list view.

@miq-bot
Copy link
Member

miq-bot commented Jun 2, 2017

Checked commit mzazrivec@db9e747 with ruby 2.2.6, rubocop 0.47.1, and haml-lint 0.20.0
0 files checked, 0 offenses detected
Everything looks fine. 🏆

@chessbyte chessbyte merged commit 8cc469c into ManageIQ:master Jun 3, 2017
@chessbyte chessbyte added this to the Sprint 62 Ending Jun 5, 2017 milestone Jun 3, 2017
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants