Fix issue where plugin settings had higher precedence than manageiq #16535
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
One of the side effects of this is that in production deployments with overrides, the overrides were being clobbered by the plugins. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1517938
|
Checked commit Fryguy@63759e4 with ruby 2.3.3, rubocop 0.47.1, haml-lint 0.20.0, and yamllint 1.10.0 |
gtanzillo
approved these changes
Nov 28, 2017
simaishi
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 28, 2017
Fix issue where plugin settings had higher precedence than manageiq (cherry picked from commit a9a2bff) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1518290
|
Gaprindashvili backport details: |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
One of the side effects of this is that in production deployments with
overrides, the overrides were being clobbered by the plugins.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1517938