-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 898
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Change the way active_provisions are calculated. #16831
Merged
gmcculloug
merged 1 commit into
ManageIQ:master
from
tinaafitz:active_provisions_using_requests
Jan 19, 2018
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@tinaafitz This is a much clearer solution and almost completely gets the quota logic away from doing lookups in
MiqQueue
. (One call left in this file)My one concern is the possibility for false-positive MiqRequest instances being returned. We had that issue before, but it is slightly higher now because in the past clearing a queue would have removed the request from being returned from this method. Now clearing the queue or some other error could leave the request in what looks like a valid state.
Wondering if it makes sense to log a count and list of IDs that are being returned here. Or maybe we create a small script in the
tools
directory to help users identify what MiqRequest objects are in play for quota.Thoughts?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I agree that this is a much clearer solution than the previous MiqQueue lookup logic. Your false-positive concern is valid. While I was testing this changes, I did exactly that and added logging for the count and request ID's being included in the active counts. I'm in favor of the tools/script approach to help users identify the MiqRequest objects in play for quota.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
A major difference in this approach is that requests will be more likely to be denied based on the active requests, whereas before, the requests would be much more likely to be approved and cause quota to go negative.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Sound good. Please open a git issue for creating that tools script with a reference back to this PR. I think that is a task we can assign to @billfitzgerald0120.