Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Remove admin_user? method #17850

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Aug 22, 2018
Merged

Remove admin_user? method #17850

merged 2 commits into from
Aug 22, 2018

Conversation

kbrock
Copy link
Member

@kbrock kbrock commented Aug 13, 2018

Kinda related to #17849

In #17444 (and related PRs) We transitioned generic references of admin_user? to more specialized functionality like request_admin_user?

All references to admin_user? were removed. This removes the method ✂️✂️✂️

@miq-bot
Copy link
Member

miq-bot commented Aug 16, 2018

This pull request is not mergeable. Please rebase and repush.

In ManageIQ#17444 and related PRs
References to generic admin_user and used request_admin_user/others

This removes the method for good
The role of "administrator" specially set product features
This has been removed. So we are focusing on features and
not some magic "administrator" role
@miq-bot
Copy link
Member

miq-bot commented Aug 16, 2018

Checked commits kbrock/manageiq@e94374b~...a72fce8 with ruby 2.3.3, rubocop 0.52.1, haml-lint 0.20.0, and yamllint 1.10.0
8 files checked, 0 offenses detected
Everything looks fine. ⭐

Copy link
Member

@jrafanie jrafanie left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

What could go wrong?

@jrafanie jrafanie merged commit 3a67ef5 into ManageIQ:master Aug 22, 2018
@jrafanie jrafanie added this to the Sprint 93 Ending Aug 27, 2018 milestone Aug 22, 2018
@jrafanie jrafanie self-assigned this Aug 22, 2018
@kbrock kbrock deleted the admin_user_no_more branch August 23, 2018 13:39
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants