Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[V2V] Use default queue priority for log download #18524

Merged

Conversation

ghost
Copy link

@ghost ghost commented Mar 5, 2019

When downloading the transformation log, we queue an async task, with high priority. There's no reason to do so, so this PR reverts to normal priority, which is the default priority.

Associated RHBZ: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1655124

@ghost
Copy link
Author

ghost commented Mar 5, 2019

@miq-bot add-label transformation, bug, hammer/yes
@miq-bot add-reviewer @agrare

@miq-bot
Copy link
Member

miq-bot commented Mar 5, 2019

Checked commit fabiendupont@173ae1a with ruby 2.3.3, rubocop 0.52.1, haml-lint 0.20.0, and yamllint 1.10.0
1 file checked, 0 offenses detected
Everything looks fine. ⭐

@agrare agrare merged commit 335fa68 into ManageIQ:master Mar 5, 2019
@agrare agrare added this to the Sprint 107 Ending Mar 18, 2019 milestone Mar 5, 2019
@ghost ghost deleted the v2v_download_log_task_priority branch March 5, 2019 21:50
simaishi pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 6, 2019
…riority

[V2V] Use default queue priority for log download

(cherry picked from commit 335fa68)

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1686045
@simaishi
Copy link
Contributor

simaishi commented Mar 6, 2019

Hammer backport details:

$ git log -1
commit c3313d11d6fa49da0a4ecc4b2027131bcf37d88a
Author: Adam Grare <agrare@redhat.com>
Date:   Tue Mar 5 16:45:17 2019 -0500

    Merge pull request #18524 from fdupont-redhat/v2v_download_log_task_priority
    
    [V2V] Use default queue priority for log download
    
    (cherry picked from commit 335fa687a68de54b6a3f06c397b8103a6ebf0104)
    
    https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1686045

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants