-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 898
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Generate retire requests from the base class name #19398
Generate retire requests from the base class name #19398
Conversation
@miq-bot add_label retirement |
@bdunne could I please ask you to review? |
256c5cd
to
9a032c4
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Looks good, thanks @d-m-u for resolving this so quickly. :-)
Checked commit d-m-u@9a032c4 with ruby 2.4.6, rubocop 0.69.0, haml-lint 0.20.0, and yamllint 1.10.0 |
…_constantize Generate retire requests from the base class name (cherry picked from commit b7c9523) Fixes https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1762428
Hammer backport details:
|
…ass_name_constantize" This reverts commit 97c8ac3. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1762428
Reverted the hammer backport:
due to Travis error:
|
Because it depended on #19064 and the linked content PR ManageIQ/manageiq-content#552, and ManageIQ/manageiq-api#662, all of which aren't backported though they're all marked hammer/yes. I can't do anything here. |
You did what you needed to do (mentioning dependencies), so it's all set now 😄 |
…_constantize Generate retire requests from the base class name (cherry picked from commit b7c9523) Fixes https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1784486
Ivanchuk backport details:
|
…_constantize Generate retire requests from the base class name (cherry picked from commit b7c9523) Fixes https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1762428
Hammer backport details:
|
ServiceAnsiblePlaybook.demodulize + "RetireRequest"
=> bad cause we try and constantize that n there is no SAPRR; we should be using only the base class name formake_retire_request
Also, it's passing specs and got BZ opener approval here: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1731559#c6
Depends on #19064
Fixes https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1731559
@miq-bot add_label bug, hammer/yes, ivanchuk/yes
@miq-bot add_reviewer @tinaafitz
@miq-bot add_reviewer @lfu