Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
fix for the zeros / NA discrepancy #275
fix for the zeros / NA discrepancy #275
Changes from all commits
d503c25
1bdfbde
18ff81b
1c64535
387867e
4eab905
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
There are no files selected for viewing
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I don't know much about this
preprocessing_info
, but it seems to store information in human-readable keys.This could lead to problems (say, I access something as
self.preprocessing_info.get("Missing values were removed.")
(did you spot the trailing dot? ;-))I would suggest introducing a set of string constants, e.g.
MISSING_VALUES_REMOVED = "Missing values were removed"
somewhere and access this store exclusively through them
(not now, just for the future)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
is this the same as
RandomForest
? maybe introduce this as anothermethod
?There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
It's also based on multiple trees, so I don't know what would be right. I could call it gradient boosting, but this could be less known for non-technical people, although it would be more correct
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
you could check how https://numpy.org/doc/stable/reference/generated/numpy.linalg.norm.html works with
NaN
sThere was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Couldn't get it to work properly, I don't think it works well with
NaN
s