Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Globally use assertIsVariableReference() instead of the longer form #332

Merged
merged 5 commits into from
Jul 19, 2023

Conversation

Claes65
Copy link
Contributor

@Claes65 Claes65 commented Jul 17, 2023

No description provided.

@Claes65 Claes65 changed the title Use assertisvarref Over all use assertIsVariableReference instead of the longer form Jul 17, 2023
@Claes65 Claes65 changed the title Over all use assertIsVariableReference instead of the longer form Globally use assertIsVariableReference instead of the longer form Jul 17, 2023
@Claes65 Claes65 changed the title Globally use assertIsVariableReference instead of the longer form Globally use assertIsVariableReference() instead of the longer form Jul 17, 2023
@Claes65 Claes65 marked this pull request as ready for review July 18, 2023 14:43
@Claes65
Copy link
Contributor Author

Claes65 commented Jul 18, 2023

duplicate code originates from CALL family PR

@sonarqubecloud
Copy link

Kudos, SonarCloud Quality Gate passed!    Quality Gate passed

Bug A 0 Bugs
Vulnerability A 0 Vulnerabilities
Security Hotspot A 0 Security Hotspots
Code Smell A 0 Code Smells

No Coverage information No Coverage information
0.0% 0.0% Duplication

@MarkusAmshove MarkusAmshove added the infrastructure🧰 CI, Build, ... label Jul 19, 2023
@MarkusAmshove MarkusAmshove added this to the v0.8 milestone Jul 19, 2023
@MarkusAmshove MarkusAmshove merged commit 40799f4 into MarkusAmshove:main Jul 19, 2023
@Claes65 Claes65 deleted the use-assertisvarref branch July 19, 2023 12:32
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
infrastructure🧰 CI, Build, ...
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants