Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Force legacy "precise" build dist for TravisCI #7422

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Aug 3, 2017

Conversation

fiveangle
Copy link
Contributor

@fiveangle fiveangle commented Aug 3, 2017

TravisCI "trusty" build dist isn't picking up build path causing travis checks to fail. Reverting to legacy "precise" dist while we investigate

@fiveangle
Copy link
Contributor Author

wait on this one - looks like build failed

@fiveangle fiveangle changed the title Force legacy "pristine" build dist for TravisCI Force legacy "precise" build dist for TravisCI Aug 3, 2017
@fiveangle
Copy link
Contributor Author

okay, fixed - this one is good to go

TravisCI "trusty" build dist isn't picking up build path causing travis checks to fail.  Reverting to legacy "precise" dist while we investigate

pristine != precise
@Roxy-3D Roxy-3D merged commit c650907 into MarlinFirmware:bugfix-1.1.x Aug 3, 2017
@fiveangle fiveangle deleted the bf_travis_fix branch August 3, 2017 14:35
orobardet pushed a commit to orobardet/Renren3DPro-Marlin that referenced this pull request Aug 21, 2017
TravisCI "trusty" build dist isn't picking up build path causing travis checks to fail.  Reverting to legacy "precise" dist while we investigate

pristine != precise
rpls pushed a commit to rpls/Marlin that referenced this pull request Nov 10, 2017
TravisCI "trusty" build dist isn't picking up build path causing travis checks to fail.  Reverting to legacy "precise" dist while we investigate

pristine != precise
damicreabox pushed a commit to damicreabox/Marlin that referenced this pull request Sep 14, 2018
TravisCI "trusty" build dist isn't picking up build path causing travis checks to fail.  Reverting to legacy "precise" dist while we investigate

pristine != precise
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants