-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 14
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Change extra block printing to be list agnostic and smaller #29
Closed
Closed
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Not related to the attached line.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I agree, I would try to find a way. Maybe return
OrderedDict
fromget_json
when needed.My idea is that
get_json
with itsget_all
param should do the job. I.e. it should return all data whenget_all=True
and removeUNWANTED_TRAITS
whenget_all=False
.print_lnk_file
should only improve keys and values to more readable form.So you think the YAML version is actually better than master version which uses uppercase on some keys? I think there could be a way to replicate the style from master and uppercase some of keys, but maybe it is not needed.
God point 😃
I did it on purpose. I wanted to make it different compared to regular blocks, i.e. blocks defined in the official documentation. This unknown block is kind of special.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I see there is no need for that,
get_json
already works good. Passingsort_keys=False
toyaml.dump
the solution.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The
sort_key=False
is almost too easy as a solution for the biggest issue. 🤩Regarding the headers, I meant the master version is a little more obvious, trying to bring attention to certain sections for quick reading by having certain lines in all-uppercase. It may not be that important. This is really a very minor change with the rest (ordering + unwanted_traits) preserved.
This looks awesome!
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Well, I also like readability from master. So here is the newest version. It starts to look pretty similar, but there are still some differences. For example, I would like to keep the original (master) format of header attributes, e.g. flags.
Btw, Inserting empty lines is pretty hacky code 😄 I hope there is a better way.