Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

add tag for UnderWaterBridge #6250

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Dec 14, 2024

Conversation

kuronekochomusuke
Copy link
Collaborator

  • add tag for UnderWaterBridge
  • these maps were probably built with incorrect bridges levels

image

Copy link

codecov bot commented Dec 8, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 28.99%. Comparing base (2e45dc0) to head (8ff043b).
Report is 8 commits behind head on master.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff            @@
##             master    #6250   +/-   ##
=========================================
  Coverage     28.99%   28.99%           
- Complexity    13982    13984    +2     
=========================================
  Files          2652     2652           
  Lines        268296   268305    +9     
  Branches      47764    47768    +4     
=========================================
+ Hits          77799    77804    +5     
- Misses       186615   186617    +2     
- Partials       3882     3884    +2     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

if (hex.containsTerrain(WATER)
&& hex.containsTerrain(BRIDGE)
&& (hex.terrainLevel(BRIDGE_ELEV) < hex.terrainLevel(WATER))) {
underWaterBride++;
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Underwater Bride? Whole new worlds :D

@SJuliez SJuliez merged commit bd5468c into MegaMek:master Dec 14, 2024
4 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants