Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

RFE - Display CASE II at the top of a location #1016

Closed
AlphaSled opened this issue Jan 25, 2022 · 6 comments · Fixed by #1017
Closed

RFE - Display CASE II at the top of a location #1016

AlphaSled opened this issue Jan 25, 2022 · 6 comments · Fixed by #1017
Assignees

Comments

@AlphaSled
Copy link

v.49.6

On a record sheet's critical table, locations with CASE have (CASE) listed at the top of said location, to the right of the location name.
Units with CASE II do not currently do this. Would it be possible to have (CASE II) be listed in the same way?

@SJuliez
Copy link
Member

SJuliez commented Jan 25, 2022

Currently this seems only to be done for Clan base (I think this includes clan base mixed) and indeed not for CASE II, probably based on the notion that in other cases CASE/CASEII is written in a crit slot already. Is the wish to have CASEII additionally noted in the title? In that case the question would be if this should be done for IS as well.

@AlphaSled
Copy link
Author

Ah, of course. I forgot that IS CASE wasn't put up there either.
It would be great if this were done with every type of CASE, yes. It'd really makes things clearer for the player.

@SJuliez
Copy link
Member

SJuliez commented Jan 25, 2022

Does it make sense to not print CASE on Clan units for HD and CT even if it qualifies for auto-CASE (has ammo)?

@AlphaSled
Copy link
Author

I would say yes, just because there might eventually be rules that benefit from knowing this in some way.

@SJuliez
Copy link
Member

SJuliez commented Jan 25, 2022

Eh I take your answer means "Print it even for HD/CT", right? Because I asked if it made sense to NOT print it :)

@AlphaSled
Copy link
Author

Yeah, sorry, that could have been clearer on my behalf. I think it should be printed even for the HD/CT.
Thanks for bearing with my unclear language :)

@SJuliez SJuliez self-assigned this Jan 26, 2022
SJuliez added a commit to SJuliez/megameklab that referenced this issue Jan 26, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

2 participants