Error: Account Id [UUID] not found #26377
Assignees
Labels
needs-reproduction
regression-prod-11.9.0
Regression bug that was found in production in release 11.9.0
release-12.4.0
Issue or pull request that will be included in release 12.4.0
release-12.6.0
Issue or pull request that will be included in release 12.6.0
Sev1-high
High severity; partial loss of service with severe impact upon users, with no workaround.
team-accounts
type-bug
Comments
Gudahtt
changed the title
Gudahtt
added
type-bug
Sev1-high
Gudahtt
added
the
regression-prod-11.9.0
|
I found two places in The second place is the |
3 tasks
|
Opening the issue again since the fix is not in the client yet |
7 tasks
montelaidev
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Aug 22, 2024
…Account (#26573) <!-- Please submit this PR as a draft initially. Do not mark it as "Ready for review" until the template has been completely filled out, and PR status checks have passed at least once. --> ## **Description** This PR bumps the `AccountsController` and introduces a new migration. The `updateAccounts` methods from the `AccountsController` now checks if the selectedAccount is undefined and recovers from this. The migration updates the selectedAccount values that are not defined. <!-- Write a short description of the changes included in this pull request, also include relevant motivation and context. Have in mind the following questions: 1. What is the reason for the change? 2. What is the improvement/solution? --> [](https://codespaces.new/MetaMask/metamask-extension/pull/26573?quickstart=1) ## **Related issues** Fixes: #26377 ## **Manual testing steps** 1. Go to this page... 2. 3. ## **Screenshots/Recordings** <!-- If applicable, add screenshots and/or recordings to visualize the before and after of your change. --> ### **Before** <!-- [screenshots/recordings] --> ### **After** <!-- [screenshots/recordings] --> ## **Pre-merge author checklist** - [x] I've followed [MetaMask Contributor Docs](https://github.com/MetaMask/contributor-docs) and [MetaMask Extension Coding Standards](https://github.com/MetaMask/metamask-extension/blob/develop/.github/guidelines/CODING_GUIDELINES.md). - [x] I've completed the PR template to the best of my ability - [x] I’ve included tests if applicable - [x] I’ve documented my code using [JSDoc](https://jsdoc.app/) format if applicable - [x] I’ve applied the right labels on the PR (see [labeling guidelines](https://github.com/MetaMask/metamask-extension/blob/develop/.github/guidelines/LABELING_GUIDELINES.md)). Not required for external contributors. ## **Pre-merge reviewer checklist** - [ ] I've manually tested the PR (e.g. pull and build branch, run the app, test code being changed). - [ ] I confirm that this PR addresses all acceptance criteria described in the ticket it closes and includes the necessary testing evidence such as recordings and or screenshots. --------- Co-authored-by: MetaMask Bot <metamaskbot@users.noreply.github.com>
metamaskbot
added
the
release-12.5.0
montelaidev
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Aug 22, 2024
…Account (#26573) <!-- Please submit this PR as a draft initially. Do not mark it as "Ready for review" until the template has been completely filled out, and PR status checks have passed at least once. --> This PR bumps the `AccountsController` and introduces a new migration. The `updateAccounts` methods from the `AccountsController` now checks if the selectedAccount is undefined and recovers from this. The migration updates the selectedAccount values that are not defined. <!-- Write a short description of the changes included in this pull request, also include relevant motivation and context. Have in mind the following questions: 1. What is the reason for the change? 2. What is the improvement/solution? --> [](https://codespaces.new/MetaMask/metamask-extension/pull/26573?quickstart=1) Fixes: #26377 1. Go to this page... 2. 3. <!-- If applicable, add screenshots and/or recordings to visualize the before and after of your change. --> <!-- [screenshots/recordings] --> <!-- [screenshots/recordings] --> - [x] I've followed [MetaMask Contributor Docs](https://github.com/MetaMask/contributor-docs) and [MetaMask Extension Coding Standards](https://github.com/MetaMask/metamask-extension/blob/develop/.github/guidelines/CODING_GUIDELINES.md). - [x] I've completed the PR template to the best of my ability - [x] I’ve included tests if applicable - [x] I’ve documented my code using [JSDoc](https://jsdoc.app/) format if applicable - [x] I’ve applied the right labels on the PR (see [labeling guidelines](https://github.com/MetaMask/metamask-extension/blob/develop/.github/guidelines/LABELING_GUIDELINES.md)). Not required for external contributors. - [ ] I've manually tested the PR (e.g. pull and build branch, run the app, test code being changed). - [ ] I confirm that this PR addresses all acceptance criteria described in the ticket it closes and includes the necessary testing evidence such as recordings and or screenshots. --------- Co-authored-by: MetaMask Bot <metamaskbot@users.noreply.github.com>
This was referenced Aug 22, 2024
7 tasks
Gudahtt
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Aug 29, 2024
## **Description** Migration 121.1 has been updated to include more state validation, so that it does not throw an error in the event that state is corrupted in some unexpected way. Unexpected corrupted state is now reported to Sentry as well. [](https://codespaces.new/MetaMask/metamask-extension/pull/26773?quickstart=1) ## **Related issues** Related: #26377 ## **Manual testing steps** The unit tests outline the scenarios that the added validation are meant to cover. Probably not worth anyone's time to manually test those. To test the migration in general though, here are the steps: * Create a dev build from v12.1.0 * Install the dev build from the `dist/chrome` directory and proceed through onboarding * Run this command in the background console: ``` chrome.storage.local.get( null, (state) => { state.data.AccountsController.internalAccounts.selectedAccount = 'unknown id'; chrome.storage.local.set(state, () => chrome.runtime.reload()); } ); ``` * The extension should now be in a broken state * Note that you can use this same script to corrupt state in other ways to test other scenarios * Disable the extension * Switch to this branch and create a dev build * Enable and reload the extension * You should see in the console that migration 121.1 has run without error * You can run `chrome.storage.local.get(console.log)` to check that the AccountsController state is now valid * The extension should no longer be broken ## **Screenshots/Recordings** N/A ## **Pre-merge author checklist** - [x] I've followed [MetaMask Contributor Docs](https://github.com/MetaMask/contributor-docs) and [MetaMask Extension Coding Standards](https://github.com/MetaMask/metamask-extension/blob/develop/.github/guidelines/CODING_GUIDELINES.md). - [x] I've completed the PR template to the best of my ability - [x] I’ve included tests if applicable - [x] I’ve documented my code using [JSDoc](https://jsdoc.app/) format if applicable - [x] I’ve applied the right labels on the PR (see [labeling guidelines](https://github.com/MetaMask/metamask-extension/blob/develop/.github/guidelines/LABELING_GUIDELINES.md)). Not required for external contributors. ## **Pre-merge reviewer checklist** - [ ] I've manually tested the PR (e.g. pull and build branch, run the app, test code being changed). - [ ] I confirm that this PR addresses all acceptance criteria described in the ticket it closes and includes the necessary testing evidence such as recordings and or screenshots.
owencraston
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
Aug 29, 2024
## **Description** Migration 121.1 has been updated to include more state validation, so that it does not throw an error in the event that state is corrupted in some unexpected way. Unexpected corrupted state is now reported to Sentry as well. [](https://codespaces.new/MetaMask/metamask-extension/pull/26773?quickstart=1) ## **Related issues** Related: #26377 ## **Manual testing steps** The unit tests outline the scenarios that the added validation are meant to cover. Probably not worth anyone's time to manually test those. To test the migration in general though, here are the steps: * Create a dev build from v12.1.0 * Install the dev build from the `dist/chrome` directory and proceed through onboarding * Run this command in the background console: ``` chrome.storage.local.get( null, (state) => { state.data.AccountsController.internalAccounts.selectedAccount = 'unknown id'; chrome.storage.local.set(state, () => chrome.runtime.reload()); } ); ``` * The extension should now be in a broken state * Note that you can use this same script to corrupt state in other ways to test other scenarios * Disable the extension * Switch to this branch and create a dev build * Enable and reload the extension * You should see in the console that migration 121.1 has run without error * You can run `chrome.storage.local.get(console.log)` to check that the AccountsController state is now valid * The extension should no longer be broken ## **Screenshots/Recordings** N/A ## **Pre-merge author checklist** - [x] I've followed [MetaMask Contributor Docs](https://github.com/MetaMask/contributor-docs) and [MetaMask Extension Coding Standards](https://github.com/MetaMask/metamask-extension/blob/develop/.github/guidelines/CODING_GUIDELINES.md). - [x] I've completed the PR template to the best of my ability - [x] I’ve included tests if applicable - [x] I’ve documented my code using [JSDoc](https://jsdoc.app/) format if applicable - [x] I’ve applied the right labels on the PR (see [labeling guidelines](https://github.com/MetaMask/metamask-extension/blob/develop/.github/guidelines/LABELING_GUIDELINES.md)). Not required for external contributors. ## **Pre-merge reviewer checklist** - [ ] I've manually tested the PR (e.g. pull and build branch, run the app, test code being changed). - [ ] I confirm that this PR addresses all acceptance criteria described in the ticket it closes and includes the necessary testing evidence such as recordings and or screenshots.
7 tasks
montelaidev
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Aug 30, 2024
…Account (#26573) <!-- Please submit this PR as a draft initially. Do not mark it as "Ready for review" until the template has been completely filled out, and PR status checks have passed at least once. --> This PR bumps the `AccountsController` and introduces a new migration. The `updateAccounts` methods from the `AccountsController` now checks if the selectedAccount is undefined and recovers from this. The migration updates the selectedAccount values that are not defined. <!-- Write a short description of the changes included in this pull request, also include relevant motivation and context. Have in mind the following questions: 1. What is the reason for the change? 2. What is the improvement/solution? --> [](https://codespaces.new/MetaMask/metamask-extension/pull/26573?quickstart=1) Fixes: #26377 1. Go to this page... 2. 3. <!-- If applicable, add screenshots and/or recordings to visualize the before and after of your change. --> <!-- [screenshots/recordings] --> <!-- [screenshots/recordings] --> - [x] I've followed [MetaMask Contributor Docs](https://github.com/MetaMask/contributor-docs) and [MetaMask Extension Coding Standards](https://github.com/MetaMask/metamask-extension/blob/develop/.github/guidelines/CODING_GUIDELINES.md). - [x] I've completed the PR template to the best of my ability - [x] I’ve included tests if applicable - [x] I’ve documented my code using [JSDoc](https://jsdoc.app/) format if applicable - [x] I’ve applied the right labels on the PR (see [labeling guidelines](https://github.com/MetaMask/metamask-extension/blob/develop/.github/guidelines/LABELING_GUIDELINES.md)). Not required for external contributors. - [ ] I've manually tested the PR (e.g. pull and build branch, run the app, test code being changed). - [ ] I confirm that this PR addresses all acceptance criteria described in the ticket it closes and includes the necessary testing evidence such as recordings and or screenshots. --------- Co-authored-by: MetaMask Bot <metamaskbot@users.noreply.github.com>
chloeYue
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
Aug 30, 2024
## **Description** This PR cherry picks two improvements to the latest accounts controller migrations into the latest release. - #26742 - #26773 [](https://codespaces.new/MetaMask/metamask-extension/pull/26778?quickstart=1) ## **Related issues** Fixes: #26377 ## **Manual testing steps** ## **Screenshots/Recordings** <!-- If applicable, add screenshots and/or recordings to visualize the before and after of your change. --> ### **Before** <!-- [screenshots/recordings] --> ### **After** <!-- [screenshots/recordings] --> ## **Pre-merge author checklist** - [ ] I've followed [MetaMask Contributor Docs](https://github.com/MetaMask/contributor-docs) and [MetaMask Extension Coding Standards](https://github.com/MetaMask/metamask-extension/blob/develop/.github/guidelines/CODING_GUIDELINES.md). - [ ] I've completed the PR template to the best of my ability - [ ] I’ve included tests if applicable - [ ] I’ve documented my code using [JSDoc](https://jsdoc.app/) format if applicable - [ ] I’ve applied the right labels on the PR (see [labeling guidelines](https://github.com/MetaMask/metamask-extension/blob/develop/.github/guidelines/LABELING_GUIDELINES.md)). Not required for external contributors. ## **Pre-merge reviewer checklist** - [ ] I've manually tested the PR (e.g. pull and build branch, run the app, test code being changed). - [ ] I confirm that this PR addresses all acceptance criteria described in the ticket it closes and includes the necessary testing evidence such as recordings and or screenshots. --------- Co-authored-by: Monte Lai <monte.lai@consensys.net> Co-authored-by: Mark Stacey <markjstacey@gmail.com>
montelaidev
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Aug 30, 2024
…Account (#26573) <!-- Please submit this PR as a draft initially. Do not mark it as "Ready for review" until the template has been completely filled out, and PR status checks have passed at least once. --> This PR bumps the `AccountsController` and introduces a new migration. The `updateAccounts` methods from the `AccountsController` now checks if the selectedAccount is undefined and recovers from this. The migration updates the selectedAccount values that are not defined. <!-- Write a short description of the changes included in this pull request, also include relevant motivation and context. Have in mind the following questions: 1. What is the reason for the change? 2. What is the improvement/solution? --> [](https://codespaces.new/MetaMask/metamask-extension/pull/26573?quickstart=1) Fixes: #26377 1. Go to this page... 2. 3. <!-- If applicable, add screenshots and/or recordings to visualize the before and after of your change. --> <!-- [screenshots/recordings] --> <!-- [screenshots/recordings] --> - [x] I've followed [MetaMask Contributor Docs](https://github.com/MetaMask/contributor-docs) and [MetaMask Extension Coding Standards](https://github.com/MetaMask/metamask-extension/blob/develop/.github/guidelines/CODING_GUIDELINES.md). - [x] I've completed the PR template to the best of my ability - [x] I’ve included tests if applicable - [x] I’ve documented my code using [JSDoc](https://jsdoc.app/) format if applicable - [x] I’ve applied the right labels on the PR (see [labeling guidelines](https://github.com/MetaMask/metamask-extension/blob/develop/.github/guidelines/LABELING_GUIDELINES.md)). Not required for external contributors. - [ ] I've manually tested the PR (e.g. pull and build branch, run the app, test code being changed). - [ ] I confirm that this PR addresses all acceptance criteria described in the ticket it closes and includes the necessary testing evidence such as recordings and or screenshots. --------- Co-authored-by: MetaMask Bot <metamaskbot@users.noreply.github.com>
|
We're still seeing this on v12.1.3 |
7 tasks
|
Sentry Issue: METAMASK-XBSZ |
|
Sentry Issue: METAMASK-XATW |
|
Sentry Issue: METAMASK-XA1N |
|
Duplicate issue with interesting context: #26623 |
|
Hi @gantunesr , kindly following up on this issue: what are the next steps identified for resolution? |
gauthierpetetin
added
release-12.4.0
|
The current PR partially solves the problem: the user will be able to log into the extension but it doesn't recover the accounts (if they went missing). |
](https://codespaces.new/MetaMask/metamask-extension/pull/26573?quickstart=1){kind=link}
](https://codespaces.new/MetaMask/metamask-extension/pull/26773?quickstart=1){kind=link}
](https://codespaces.new/MetaMask/metamask-extension/pull/26778?quickstart=1){kind=link}
|
That must be a GH bug behind my "marked as completed", no idea how that come together. |
github-merge-queue bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
Oct 21, 2024
<!-- Please submit this PR as a draft initially. Do not mark it as "Ready for review" until the template has been completely filled out, and PR status checks have passed at least once. --> ## **Description** <!-- Write a short description of the changes included in this pull request, also include relevant motivation and context. Have in mind the following questions: 1. What is the reason for the change? 2. What is the improvement/solution? --> This PR introduces a new migration that updates the `selectedAccount` to the first account if available or the default state. ## **Related issues** Fixes: #26377 ## **Manual testing steps** 1. Go to this page... 2. 3. ## **Screenshots/Recordings** <!-- If applicable, add screenshots and/or recordings to visualize the before and after of your change. --> ### **Before** <!-- [screenshots/recordings] --> ### **After** <!-- [screenshots/recordings] --> ## **Pre-merge author checklist** - [x] I've followed [MetaMask Contributor Docs](https://github.com/MetaMask/contributor-docs) and [MetaMask Extension Coding Standards](https://github.com/MetaMask/metamask-extension/blob/develop/.github/guidelines/CODING_GUIDELINES.md). - [x] I've completed the PR template to the best of my ability - [x] I’ve included tests if applicable - [x] I’ve documented my code using [JSDoc](https://jsdoc.app/) format if applicable - [x] I’ve applied the right labels on the PR (see [labeling guidelines](https://github.com/MetaMask/metamask-extension/blob/develop/.github/guidelines/LABELING_GUIDELINES.md)). Not required for external contributors. ## **Pre-merge reviewer checklist** - [ ] I've manually tested the PR (e.g. pull and build branch, run the app, test code being changed). - [ ] I confirm that this PR addresses all acceptance criteria described in the ticket it closes and includes the necessary testing evidence such as recordings and or screenshots. --------- Co-authored-by: Charly Chevalier <charly.chevalier@consensys.net>
metamaskbot
added
the
release-12.8.0
gauthierpetetin
added
release-12.6.0
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Sentry Issue: METAMASK-X8QE
This is still happening in v12.0.1.
Duplicate issue with interesting context: #26623
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: