-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.2k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Move eth_sendTransaction
method handler to a separate module
#5968
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Gudahtt
commented
Mar 15, 2023
Gudahtt
commented
Mar 15, 2023
Gudahtt
force-pushed
the
refactor-send-transaction
branch
from
March 15, 2023 19:51
16fae8d
to
fed001a
Compare
The method handler for `eth_sendTransaction` has been moved to a separate module to simplify unit testing. Unit tests have been added as well. This module was written in TypeScript, which asked for some additional validation of the method parameters. We now throw a more explicit message when the params are missing, and when the transaction parameters are not an object. Previously the method would still throw an error in these scenarios, just with a less helpful message. The change in error message should be the only functional change here. This refactor is intended to make testing PR #5619 easier.
Gudahtt
force-pushed
the
refactor-send-transaction
branch
from
March 15, 2023 20:42
fed001a
to
0c17e7c
Compare
The Metro configuration has been updated to support `.cjs` file extensions. The `@metamask/utils` dependency relies upon the library `superstruct` which uses `.cjs` for its main exported module.
Gudahtt
added
No QA Needed
Apply this label when your PR does not need any QA effort.
needs-dev-review
PR needs reviews from other engineers (in order to receive required approvals)
labels
Mar 15, 2023
gantunesr
approved these changes
Mar 15, 2023
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM
Gudahtt
commented
Mar 15, 2023
Cal-L
approved these changes
Mar 15, 2023
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Really clean implementation. LGTM
gantunesr
added
release-6.3.0
Issue or pull request that will be included in release 6.3.0
and removed
needs-dev-review
PR needs reviews from other engineers (in order to receive required approvals)
labels
Mar 15, 2023
Sign up for free
to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.
Labels
No QA Needed
Apply this label when your PR does not need any QA effort.
release-6.3.0
Issue or pull request that will be included in release 6.3.0
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Development & PR Process
release-xx
label to identify the PR slated for a upcoming release (will be used in release discussion)needs-dev-review
label when work is completedneeds-qa
label when dev review is completedQA Passed
label when QA has signed offDescription
The method handler for
eth_sendTransaction
has been moved to a separate module to simplify unit testing. Unit tests have been added as well.This module was written in TypeScript, which asked for some additional validation of the method parameters. We now throw a more explicit message when the params are missing, and when the transaction parameters are not an object. Previously the method would still throw an error in these scenarios, just with a less helpful message. The change in error message should be the only functional change here.
Issue
This refactor is intended to make testing PR #5619 easier.
Checklist