Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Access Control Protocol #28

Open
petrklus opened this issue Apr 13, 2015 · 4 comments
Open

Access Control Protocol #28

petrklus opened this issue Apr 13, 2015 · 4 comments

Comments

@petrklus
Copy link

Hello!

When experimenting with my CyberDuck editor, I have noticed that even when I am able to upload files, the Edit menu is inactive. I think that this is due to property/permission discovery - when I select "Get Info" on a file, it states "Unknown" for read/write etc.

Is there any way to enable those options? I believe that other WebDav implementations expose those options and thus enable the very useful "edit" feature of many clients.

@meteozond
Copy link

Hi, looks like you are talking about Access Control Protocol.

@meteozond meteozond changed the title [enhancement] enable property discovery Access Control Protocol Apr 13, 2015
@petrklus
Copy link
Author

Probably! Is this planned at all? For my purposes, I literally need to
enable Cyberduck's edit button - I do not need anything more complicated.

On Mon, Apr 13, 2015 at 7:18 PM, Alexander Klimenko <
notifications@github.com> wrote:

Hi, looks like you are talking about Access Control Protocol
http://www.rfc-base.org/rfc-3744.html.


Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub
#28 (comment).

@meteozond
Copy link

Unfortunately there is no any feature like "enable Cyberduck's edit button", it depends on client software requirements. As I see Cyberduck requires ACP support.
You can try to implement your own resource providing dummy group, owner and current-user-privilege-set properties. But djangodav is only support string properties weather ACP requires DOM structure as a value #30 and dashed field names support #31.
ACP is now it planned, I see some work have to be done before It could be implemented and got lack of resources to provide it right now.

@petrklus
Copy link
Author

@meteozond Thank you very much for the info, will look into this and create a PR if we progress to a stable version.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants