[fix] 지원서 입력폼에서 단답형 입력 필드가 부모 너비를 초과하여 레이아웃 깨짐#603
Conversation
oesnuj
added
🐞 Bug
|
Warning
|
| Cohort / File(s) | Change Summary |
|---|---|
CustomTextArea 스타일 변경frontend/src/components/common/CustomTextArea/CustomTextArea.styles.ts |
TextAreaContainer의 min-width: 300px을 max-width: 100%로 변경하여 최소 너비 제한을 없애고 최대 너비를 부모에 맞춤 |
InputField 스타일 변경frontend/src/components/common/InputField/InputField.styles.ts |
InputContainer의 min-width: 300px 제거, max-width: 100% 적용. media query에서 min-width: 0 제거. Input의 padding을 오른쪽 여백 없이 12px 18px으로 변경 |
ApplicationFormPage 스타일 변경frontend/src/pages/ApplicationFormPage/ApplicationFormPage.styles.ts |
FormDescription의 패딩을 늘리고 배경색(#f5f5f5)과 border-radius(6px)를 추가, 모바일 패딩도 조정 |
Estimated code review effort
🎯 2 (Simple) | ⏱️ ~8 minutes
Possibly related issues
- [fix] 지원서 입력폼에서 단답형 입력 필드가 부모 너비를 초과하여 레이아웃 깨짐 #600: InputField와 CustomTextArea의 max-width 및 min-width CSS 속성 변경으로 입력 필드가 부모 컨테이너를 넘지 않도록 수정되어, 이슈에서 제기된 레이아웃 깨짐 문제를 직접적으로 해결합니다.
Possibly related PRs
- [feature] 지원서 질문 추가/삭제 및 장문형 질문 타입 구현 #454: 해당 PR은 TextAreaContainer와 InputContainer의 width 제약 관련 스타일을 수정하며, 본 PR과 동일 컴포넌트의 스타일 변경과 직접적으로 연관됩니다.
- [refactor] 관리자 페이지에서 지원서 제작 시 글자 수 제한 수정 #568: 이 PR은 CustomTextArea의 스타일 및 기능(글자수 제한, textarea 교체 등) 변경을 다루며, 본 PR에서 수정한 CustomTextArea 스타일과 직접 연결됩니다.
Suggested reviewers
- lepitaaar
- seongwon030
"""
Note
⚡️ Unit Test Generation is now available in beta!
Learn more here, or try it out under "Finishing Touches" below.
📜 Recent review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
frontend/src/pages/ApplicationFormPage/ApplicationFormPage.styles.ts(1 hunks)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
- frontend/src/pages/ApplicationFormPage/ApplicationFormPage.styles.ts
✨ Finishing Touches
- 📝 Generate Docstrings
🧪 Generate unit tests
- Create PR with unit tests
- Post copyable unit tests in a comment
- Commit unit tests in branch
fix/#600-applyform-shorttext-width
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.
🪧 Tips
Chat
There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
- Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.Explain this complex logic.Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
- Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag
@coderabbitaiin a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:@coderabbitai explain this code block.@coderabbitai modularize this function.
- PR comments: Tag
@coderabbitaiin a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:@coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.@coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and explain its main purpose.@coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.@coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.
Support
Need help? Create a ticket on our support page for assistance with any issues or questions.
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.
CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
@coderabbitai pauseto pause the reviews on a PR.@coderabbitai resumeto resume the paused reviews.@coderabbitai reviewto trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.@coderabbitai full reviewto do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.@coderabbitai summaryto regenerate the summary of the PR.@coderabbitai generate docstringsto generate docstrings for this PR.@coderabbitai generate sequence diagramto generate a sequence diagram of the changes in this PR.@coderabbitai generate unit teststo generate unit tests for this PR.@coderabbitai resolveresolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.@coderabbitai configurationto show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.@coderabbitai helpto get help.
Other keywords and placeholders
- Add
@coderabbitai ignoreanywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed. - Add
@coderabbitai summaryto generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description. - Add
@coderabbitaianywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.
Documentation and Community
- Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
- Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
- Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.
|
The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎
|
oesnuj
changed the title
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
frontend/src/components/common/CustomTextArea/CustomTextArea.styles.ts (1)
3-3: InputField와의 코드 중복 해결을 고려해보세요.TODO 주석에서 언급된 대로 InputField 컴포넌트와 중복되는 스타일이 많습니다. 공통 스타일을 추출하여 재사용성을 높이는 리팩토링을 검토해보세요.
공통 스타일 컴포넌트를 생성하여 중복을 제거하는 리팩토링 코드를 작성해드릴까요?
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
frontend/src/components/common/CustomTextArea/CustomTextArea.styles.ts(1 hunks)frontend/src/components/common/InputField/InputField.styles.ts(2 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Path-based instructions (1)
frontend/**/*.{ts,tsx}
📄 CodeRabbit Inference Engine (frontend/.cursorrules)
frontend/**/*.{ts,tsx}: Replace magic numbers with named constants for clarity.
Replace complex or nested ternary operators with if/else statements or IIFEs for readability.
Assign complex boolean conditions to named variables.
Use consistent return types for similar functions and hooks.
Avoid hidden side effects; functions should only perform actions implied by their signature (Single Responsibility Principle).
Use unique, descriptive names for custom wrappers and functions to avoid ambiguity.
Define constants near related logic or ensure names link them clearly.
Files:
frontend/src/components/common/InputField/InputField.styles.tsfrontend/src/components/common/CustomTextArea/CustomTextArea.styles.ts
🧠 Learnings (2)
frontend/src/components/common/InputField/InputField.styles.ts (1)
Learnt from: CR
PR: Moadong/moadong#0
File: frontend/.cursorrules:0-0
Timestamp: 2025-07-19T05:09:10.702Z
Learning: Applies to frontend/**/*.{ts,tsx} : Replace magic numbers with named constants for clarity.
frontend/src/components/common/CustomTextArea/CustomTextArea.styles.ts (1)
Learnt from: CR
PR: Moadong/moadong#0
File: frontend/.cursorrules:0-0
Timestamp: 2025-07-19T05:09:10.702Z
Learning: Applies to frontend/**/*.{ts,tsx} : Replace magic numbers with named constants for clarity.
🔇 Additional comments (3)
frontend/src/components/common/CustomTextArea/CustomTextArea.styles.ts (1)
7-7: 모바일 레이아웃 개선이 올바르게 적용되었습니다.
max-width: 100%추가로 컨테이너가 부모 요소의 너비를 초과하지 않도록 제한하여 모바일에서의 레이아웃 깨짐 문제를 해결했습니다.frontend/src/components/common/InputField/InputField.styles.ts (2)
5-5: 모바일 반응형 디자인이 올바르게 적용되었습니다.
max-width: 100%속성 추가로 입력 필드가 부모 컨테이너 너비를 초과하지 않도록 제한하여 모바일에서의 레이아웃 문제를 해결했습니다.
29-29: 패딩 조정이 모바일 레이아웃에 적합합니다.오른쪽 패딩을 80px에서 18px로 줄여서 모바일 환경에서 더 효율적인 공간 활용을 가능하게 했습니다. 이는 ClearButton이나 ToggleButton을 위한 공간 확보와 일관성을 유지합니다.
3 participants
#️⃣ 관련 이슈
📝 작업 내용
InputContainer,TextAreaContainer에box-sizing: border-box,max-width: 100%추가max-width를 적용하여 반응형 대응🎯 문제 원인
min-width: 300px,width: 60%설정이 모바일에서 비율 계산에 의해 실제 너비보다 커짐box-sizing미설정으로 padding 포함 계산 시 width 초과📷 before | after 비교
소개글 배경도 추가함
Summary by CodeRabbit