Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Carsharing extension #347

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

fchabouis
Copy link
Contributor

Who we are

Transport.data.gouv.fr is the French national access point for mobility data.

We are opening this PR on our behalf and on behalf of a working group involving the “Association des Acteurs de l’Autopartage” (AAA), a French National Association for carsharing grouping 20+ operators, and Iodines.

What problem does your proposal solve?

This PR aims to extend the current GBFS specification to allow car sharing support.
More details can be found the issue #338.

Proposal overview

We would like to propose an evolution of the GBFS which allows to model car-sharing data by extending the following files.

  • vehicle_types - new optional data only:
    - rider capacity
    - trunk size
    - C02 emission
    - environmental classification
    - accessories
    - ...

  • station_information.json - new optional data only:
    - parking_type
    - parking_hoop
    - contact_phone

  • free_bike_status.json - new optional data only:
    - a datetime specifying how much time the vehicle is available (for round trip carsharing)
    - accessories present in the vehicle (such as child seats)

Is this a breaking change?

  • Yes
  • No
  • Unsure

Which files are affected by this change?

  • vehicle_types.json
  • station_information.json
  • free_bike_status.json

@fchabouis fchabouis changed the title add carsharing infos to vehicle_types.json Carsharing extension Aug 9, 2021
@fchabouis fchabouis closed this Aug 9, 2021
@fchabouis
Copy link
Contributor Author

fchabouis commented Aug 9, 2021

This PR is still a draft, I intended to open the PR on our fork for the moment.

@heidiguenin
Copy link
Contributor

Hello Francois! With regards to your (now-deleted) comment, we know that phone number needs to be more clearly defined. That will be a breaking change, though, so it's planned for introduction in v3.0.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants