af_packet: do not use READ_ONCE() in packet_bind()

A recent patch added READ_ONCE() in packet_bind() and packet_bind_spkt()

This is better handled by reading pkt_sk(sk)->num later
in packet_do_bind() while appropriate lock is held.

READ_ONCE() in writers are often an evidence of something being wrong.

Fixes: 822b5a1 ("af_packet: Fix data-races of pkt_sk(sk)->num.")
Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Willem de Bruijn <willemb@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Jiri Pirko <jiri@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: Kuniyuki Iwashima <kuniyu@amazon.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230526154342.2533026-1-edumazet@google.com
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>

net/packet/af_packet.c

@@ -3201,6 +3201,9 @@ static int packet_do_bind(struct sock *sk, const char *name, int ifindex,
 
 	lock_sock(sk);
 	spin_lock(&po->bind_lock);
+	if (!proto)
+		proto = po->num;
+
 	rcu_read_lock();
 
 	if (po->fanout) {
@@ -3299,7 +3302,7 @@ static int packet_bind_spkt(struct socket *sock, struct sockaddr *uaddr,
 	memcpy(name, uaddr->sa_data, sizeof(uaddr->sa_data_min));
 	name[sizeof(uaddr->sa_data_min)] = 0;
 
-	return packet_do_bind(sk, name, 0, READ_ONCE(pkt_sk(sk)->num));
+	return packet_do_bind(sk, name, 0, 0);
 }
 
 static int packet_bind(struct socket *sock, struct sockaddr *uaddr, int addr_len)
@@ -3316,8 +3319,7 @@ static int packet_bind(struct socket *sock, struct sockaddr *uaddr, int addr_len
 	if (sll->sll_family != AF_PACKET)
 		return -EINVAL;
 
-	return packet_do_bind(sk, NULL, sll->sll_ifindex,
-			      sll->sll_protocol ? : READ_ONCE(pkt_sk(sk)->num));
+	return packet_do_bind(sk, NULL, sll->sll_ifindex, sll->sll_protocol);
 }
 
 static struct proto packet_proto = {