-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
f.e30_alpha04a.FMTHIST.ne30_L93.001 #604
Comments
Oops, you are right, mixed up my F-cases. I'll edit all of this. |
@wwieder the diagnostics comparing #600 to this case should show the impact of switching from ctsm5.2->5.3. The cam tag did change in those experiments (cam6_4_032 in this run and cam6_4_036 in #600), but nothing happened in between that would change answers in FMTHIST. The atm_in files don't show any change in namelist settings. I've confirmed the sea-ice tag and ice_in namelists are identical. Looking over Keith's land diagnostics, the largest changes I can find are LHEAT and FSH over Tropical land between 5-20 W/m2, and THBOT, TG changes up to 1K (cooler in NH high-latitudes, warmer over NH mid-latitudes, cooler in the Tropics). Any ideas about what might be causing those changes? |
Hi @adamrher thanks for pointing these out. Are the changes you mentioned especially concerning from the CAM side? Here's my interpretation of what may be going on with land. Part of this parameter file change aimed to decrease tropical GPP and LAI without reducing ET fluxes (in land only mode using active BGC). Thus, the increases in tropical ET that you're seeing in this CLM6-SP case would be consistent with this parameter change. I'd assume the FHS changes are just reflecting the shift in the Bowen ratio too. There are other changes in LAI between the cases that would be reflective differences in the surface datasets. We'd have to ask Peter Lawrence on the details here, but I think it's a shift in crop and forest distributions with the updated datasets? Could this cause the mid-latitude changes you're seeing? Finally, high latitude cooling that you're seeing may be consistent with the new excess ice feature that is on by default in the 5.3 tag? This one is a bit harder for me to understand? |
Purpose:
Control run with cesm3_0_alpha04a to test the new dust.
The control still uses the old dust scheme: Zender
Description:
-user_nl_clm
Case directory:
Locally (if still available):
/glade/campaign/cesm/cesmdata/cseg/runs/cesm2_0/f.e30_alpha04a.FMTHIST.ne30_L93.001
On github:
https://github.com/NCAR/amwg_dev/tree/f.e30_alpha04a.FMTHIST.ne30_L93.001
Sandbox:
Locally (if still available):
/glade/work/hannay/cesm_tags/cesm3_0_alpha04a
On github:
https://github.com/ESCOMP/CAM/tree/cesm3_0_alpha04a
Diagnostics:
https://webext.cgd.ucar.edu/FMTHIST/f.e30_alpha04a.FMTHIST.ne30_L93.001/atm/
Output:
/glade/derecho/scratch/hannay/archive/f.e30_alpha04a.FMTHIST.ne30_L93.001/
/glade/campaign/cgd/amp/amwg/climo/f.e30_alpha04a.FMTHIST.ne30_L93.001
Contacts:
@cecilehannay @tilmes @adamrher @PeterHjortLauritzen
Extra details:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: