-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 150
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
fix tsfc on ice in uncoupled non-fractional grid runs #515
Closed
junwang-noaa opened this issue
Nov 3, 2020
· 4 comments
· Fixed by #509 or ufs-community/ufs-weather-model#223
Closed
fix tsfc on ice in uncoupled non-fractional grid runs #515
junwang-noaa opened this issue
Nov 3, 2020
· 4 comments
· Fixed by #509 or ufs-community/ufs-weather-model#223
Comments
This was referenced Nov 3, 2020
Merged
I've tested this change in my featture/cpld_restart branch and I am now getting c96mx100 and c192mx050 restart repro for fractional grid. Was that expected? |
Yes. I assume your restart test is for the non-fractional grid run using
fractional grid ICs. Please let me know if it is a fractional grid run
(with frac_grid=.true.)
…On Tue, Nov 3, 2020 at 2:24 PM Denise Worthen ***@***.***> wrote:
@junwang-noaa <https://github.com/junwang-noaa>
I've tested this change in my featture/cpld_restart branch and I am now
getting c96mx100 and c192mx050 restart repro for fractional grid. Was that
expected?
—
You are receiving this because you were mentioned.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#515 (comment)>,
or unsubscribe
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AI7D6TO4J3UH6ZYMFEMUMKDSOBKG7ANCNFSM4TIZONSQ>
.
|
My test was w/ frac_grid=true. This uses the frac_grid ICs. It is the first time I got restart repro w/ frac_grid, which made me wonder whether this was expected. |
My mistake--I wasn't comparing the right two runs. I apologize! |
DusanJovic-NOAA
pushed a commit
to ufs-community/ufs-weather-model
that referenced
this issue
Nov 5, 2020
This PR adds missing HWRF physics parameterizations and updates the Ferrier-Aligo microphysics: - WRFv4 Noah LSM - GFDL surface layer - Unified HEDMF PBL - icloud=4 option in RRTMG In addition, this PR: - cleans up old/unused/unnecessary HWRF regression tests - adds the missing `effr_in=.true.` for all Thompson MP based runs (there is now a guard in fv3atm's `GFS_typedefs.F90` to prevent running Thompson MP with `effr_in=.false.` - shortens the runtime for the `fv3_ccpp_rrfs_v1beta` run from 48h to 24h - in ccpp-physics: update `tsfc` correctly when there is ice on open water grid points (fixes NCAR/ccpp-physics#515) - set `OMP_STACKSIZE` in orion and wcoss_dell_p3 job submission scripts to avoid errors with threaded tests Co-authored-by: Bin Liu <bin.liu@noaa.gov> Co-authored-by: Jili Dong <Jili.Dong@noaa.gov> Co-authored-by: Zhan Zhang <zhan.zhang@noaa.gov> Co-authored-by: Grant Firl <grantf@ucar.edu> Co-authored-by: Man.Zhang <Man.Zhang@noaa.gov> Co-authored-by: Dom Heinzeller <dom.heinzeller@noaa.gov>
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
It is found that the surface temperature (tsfc) is not updated correctly when there is ice on open water grid points in ccpp master branch. This causes the ice temperature difference between gfs.v16 ipd physics and ccpp physics. HREF also noticed some issue on the points with sea ice. The code change is in:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: