Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

dask: Dask.digitize #312

Merged
merged 5 commits into from
Feb 4, 2022

Conversation

davidhassell
Copy link
Collaborator

No description provided.

@davidhassell davidhassell added the dask Relating to the use of Dask label Feb 4, 2022
Copy link
Member

@sadielbartholomew sadielbartholomew left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

A few minor comments raised in-line, but otherwise everything looks good. As for the CI jobs, I'm not sure why the 'Run test suite' jobs ran since this is a PR to lama-to-dask, regardless they aren't relevant yet so we can ignore the failures there. The relevant tests ('Test cf.Data' and 'Linting') do pass so that indicates everything is good test-wise, along with a local pass I have observed of course.

Feel free to merge once you have seen and responded as you wish to the in-line comments! Thanks.

cf/data/data.py Show resolved Hide resolved
cf/data/data.py Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
cf/data/data.py Show resolved Hide resolved
davidhassell and others added 3 commits February 4, 2022 17:36
Co-authored-by: Sadie L. Bartholomew <sadie.bartholomew@ncas.ac.uk>
Co-authored-by: Sadie L. Bartholomew <sadie.bartholomew@ncas.ac.uk>
@sadielbartholomew sadielbartholomew merged commit d6cd3d1 into NCAS-CMS:lama-to-dask Feb 4, 2022
@davidhassell davidhassell deleted the dask-digitize branch November 15, 2022 09:13
@davidhassell davidhassell added this to the 3.14.0 milestone Nov 15, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
dask Relating to the use of Dask
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants