Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add uncertainty variants for select datasets #2187

Merged
merged 13 commits into from
Nov 12, 2024
Merged

Add uncertainty variants for select datasets #2187

merged 13 commits into from
Nov 12, 2024

Conversation

t7phy
Copy link
Member

@t7phy t7phy commented Oct 27, 2024

Adds uncertainty variants for some gluon-PDF sensitive processes where luminosity uncert is excluded, for reproducibility of pheno paper

@t7phy t7phy marked this pull request as draft October 28, 2024 15:07
@scarlehoff
Copy link
Member

scarlehoff commented Nov 1, 2024

hi @t7phy for the datasets for which the uncertainty is well separated you can create two files

  • uncertainties_wo_lumi (which you already have)
  • lumi_uncertainty

And then the data_uncertainties entry can be a list and they will be concatenated. That way the information doesn't need to be repeatead in the file with and without uncertainties (and the size of these files will be reduced considerably)

@t7phy t7phy marked this pull request as ready for review November 1, 2024 07:30
@t7phy t7phy requested a review from scarlehoff November 1, 2024 08:09
Copy link
Member

@scarlehoff scarlehoff left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks for this. Just a small comment.

However, wouldn't it be better to add this during the filter or is there a reason why this cannot be done in this way?

So, while running the filter, instead of creating the full file and afterwards separating the lumi; can't it be separated from the beginning?

@scarlehoff scarlehoff changed the base branch from master to check_newcd November 1, 2024 17:08
@scarlehoff scarlehoff force-pushed the ts261024 branch 2 times, most recently from b3c138c to c9c76e4 Compare November 1, 2024 20:58
Base automatically changed from check_newcd to master November 2, 2024 08:46
@t7phy t7phy requested a review from scarlehoff November 5, 2024 06:07
t7phy and others added 11 commits November 11, 2024 10:30
add lumi-less variant atlas 1j

add lumi-less variant atlas 2j

add lumi-less variant cms 1j

automate

add lumi-less variant h1 1j 290

add lumi-less variant h1 2jet 290

add lumi-less variant h1 jets 351

isort

add a uncert skipping util function

add lumi and lumiless for zeus 1j 38p6 pb-1

add lumi and lumiless for zeus 1j 82pb-1

add lumi and lumiless for zeus 2j 374pb-1

lumiless atlas 13tev ttb lj

lumiless atlas 13tev ttb hadr

make h1 datasets use utils func

impl sugg zeus 1j 38p6

update utils

impl sugg zeus 1j 82

impl sugg zeus 1j 82, fix metadata

impl sugg dis+j

impl sugg atlas 1j 13t

impl sugg atlas 2j 13t

impl sugg cms 1j 13t

variant->variants
Copy link
Member

@scarlehoff scarlehoff left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks, could you bump the versions in the metadata files?

Something like

version: 2
version_comment: "Separated luminosity uncertainty"

Other than that seems fine to me.

@scarlehoff scarlehoff added the Done PRs that are done but waiting on something else to merge/approve label Nov 12, 2024
@t7phy t7phy merged commit 4f87b57 into master Nov 12, 2024
7 checks passed
@t7phy t7phy deleted the ts261024 branch November 12, 2024 15:36
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
data toolchain Done PRs that are done but waiting on something else to merge/approve
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants