-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Update adani #272
Merged
Merged
Update adani #272
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
we do want to use the new one!! It has a much better understanding of the small-x region, see https://arxiv.org/pdf/2403.00513.pdf fig 2 |
giacomomagni
reviewed
Apr 2, 2024
giacomomagni
approved these changes
Apr 2, 2024
Merged
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Updating
adani
.Now the needed functions are accessed through the abjects
adani.ApproximateCoefficientFunction
andadani.HighScaleSplitLogs
.@giacomomagni regarding the new approximation for$a_{Qg}^{(3,0)}$ , do we want to use it as a default or we want the old one (I guess that the aswer is the new one but better asking)?
So far I didn't push the new version on the PyPi so this PR cannot be merged (and the tests are going to fail)