Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Make sure gfs_* DA jobs are not regression tests #1390

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Nov 27, 2024
Merged

Conversation

DavidNew-NOAA
Copy link
Collaborator

@DavidNew-NOAA DavidNew-NOAA commented Nov 26, 2024

This PR addresses the bug @RussTreadon-NOAA found that gfs_atmanlvar was being run as a regression test and using the same test reference as gdas_atmanlvar in GW PR #3120.

See NOAA-EMC/global-workflow#3120 (comment)

I've moved all activation of testing mode in JCB out of the JCB base YAMLs and into the JCB algorithm YAMLs. I test the RUN variables to make sure it's not equal to gfs.

I re-ran all the regression tests, and they all passed.

Copy link
Contributor

@RussTreadon-NOAA RussTreadon-NOAA left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Did not test but @DavidNew-NOAA did and found that all regression tests pass.

We need the changes in this PR to move g-w PR #3120 forward.

Approve.

@DavidNew-NOAA DavidNew-NOAA merged commit 9b78c7d into develop Nov 27, 2024
5 checks passed
@DavidNew-NOAA DavidNew-NOAA deleted the bugfix/gw-ci branch November 27, 2024 13:16
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants