Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merge 'regional_boundary_update' from upstream #40

Merged
merged 6 commits into from
Sep 30, 2020

Conversation

DusanJovic-NOAA
Copy link
Collaborator

No description provided.

chan-hoo and others added 3 commits September 23, 2020 11:29
Modify the halo extents of u and vt in the regional_boundary_update call
…all that caused a reproducibility issue. (#55)

Co-authored-by: Chan-hoo.Jeon <chan-hoo.jeon@noaa.gov>
@climbfuji
Copy link

Someone will need to pull this into an upcoming PR. I suspect it will change the results of all regional tests.

@climbfuji
Copy link

climbfuji commented Sep 28, 2020

@DusanJovic-NOAA can we just pull the entire noaa-gfdl dev/emc down to noaa-emc? In addition to the one commit shown here, there are documentation updates in fv_control.F90 and in the docs subdirectory. Then both repositories are fully synced.

@DusanJovic-NOAA
Copy link
Collaborator Author

I see only differences in model/fv_regional_bc.F90 when I try to open PR.

@climbfuji
Copy link

climbfuji commented Sep 28, 2020 via email

@DusanJovic-NOAA
Copy link
Collaborator Author

In the future all changes should be made to NOAA_EMC repo first. If they go directly to NOAA_GFDL (like documentation and this bug fix in fv_regional_bc.F90) then there's no need for us to maintain this fork, we can just point to GFDL's repo directly from UFS, like we do with ccpp, for example.

@DusanJovic-NOAA
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Can we merge this PR?

@climbfuji
Copy link

Can we merge this PR?

This should be part of the regression testing conducted in my upcoming ufs-weather-model PR. The fv3atm PR handles the submodule pointer update for GFDL_atmos_cubed_sphere. If you can find a way to update this PR so that it shows the documentation updates, too, then the code I am testing in NOAA-EMC/fv3atm#178 will be identical to your PR.

@climbfuji
Copy link

Associated PRs:

#40
NCAR/ccpp-physics#489
NOAA-EMC/fv3atm#178
ufs-community/ufs-weather-model#208

For regression testing information, see ufs-community/ufs-weather-model#208.

@climbfuji
Copy link

Update: after some back and forth, we know that this PR is correct and sufficient. The "missing" documentation changes were merged into NOAA-EMC dev/emc previously without updating the submodule pointer in fv3atm or running the regression tests. This PR #40 will make NOAA-GFDL dev/emc and NOAA-EMC dev/emc identical and should be merged after the testing as outlined in ufs-community/ufs-weather-model#208 is complete.

@junwang-noaa
Copy link
Collaborator

@climbfuji That is what I think.

Copy link
Collaborator

@junwang-noaa junwang-noaa left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This PR will be committed along with ufs-weather-model PR NOAA-GFDL#208

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants