Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Move unused ccpp suites to 'suites_not_used' directory #665

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Jun 28, 2023

Conversation

DusanJovic-NOAA
Copy link
Collaborator

Description

This PR moves all unused ccpp suite definition files to a separate directory (suites_not_used)
Is a change of answers expected from this PR? No.

Issue(s) addressed

Link the issues to be closed with this PR, whether in this repository, or in another repository.
(Remember, issues should always be created before starting work on a PR branch!)

Testing

How were these changes tested? Regression test on Hera
What compilers / HPCs was it tested with? Intel and gnu
Are the changes covered by regression tests? (If not, why? Do new tests need to be added?)
Have the ufs-weather-model regression test been run? Yes
On what platform? Hera

  • Will the code updates change regression test baseline? No.
  • Please commit the regression test log files in your ufs-weather-model branch

Dependencies

If testing this branch requires non-default branches in other repositories, list them.
Those branches should have matching names (ideally)

Do PRs in upstream repositories need to be merged first? No

@jkbk2004
Copy link
Collaborator

@grantfirl can you review on this pr to move unused suites to separate directory?

@jkbk2004 jkbk2004 requested a review from junwang-noaa June 26, 2023 22:15
@jkbk2004
Copy link
Collaborator

Moving old and unused suites to separate directory makes a sense. Please, go ahead to review review comments.

Copy link
Collaborator

@grantfirl grantfirl left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Seems fine to me. The reason to move them instead of remove them entirely is because someone might be using them for research, etc. that we're unaware of?

Copy link
Collaborator

@Qingfu-Liu Qingfu-Liu left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

good practice

@FernandoAndrade-NOAA
Copy link
Collaborator

Testing on #1793 has completed, please go ahead and finalize reviews/approvals and begin the merging process for this PR @BrianCurtis-NOAA @junwang-noaa

@jkbk2004 jkbk2004 self-requested a review June 28, 2023 16:14
@jkbk2004 jkbk2004 merged commit dd6cd46 into NOAA-EMC:develop Jun 28, 2023
@DusanJovic-NOAA DusanJovic-NOAA deleted the unused_ccpp_suites branch June 28, 2023 18:12
HelinWei-NOAA added a commit to HelinWei-NOAA/fv3atm that referenced this pull request Jun 29, 2023
Move unused ccpp suites to suites_not_used directory (NOAA-EMC#665)
HelinWei-NOAA added a commit to HelinWei-NOAA/fv3atm that referenced this pull request Jun 29, 2023
HelinWei-NOAA added a commit to HelinWei-NOAA/fv3atm that referenced this pull request Jun 29, 2023
Revert "Move unused ccpp suites to suites_not_used directory (NOAA-EMC#665)"
@grantfirl grantfirl mentioned this pull request Sep 1, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Move deprecated suite definition files (SDFs) into a 'untested' subdirectory
6 participants