Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Exceedance code to output comparisons of QPF with Flash Flood Guidance #8

Merged
merged 8 commits into from
Jul 7, 2021

Conversation

EricJames-NOAA
Copy link
Collaborator

This code is to output gridded binary fields indicating where model QPF exceeds Flash Flood Guidance (FFG) for 1h, 3h, 6h, and 12h accumulation periods. SURFCE.f and grib2_module.f were modified to read in FFG GRIB2 files (available on /public) and do the comparison. Flat files were also modified to add the four new exceedance fields.

Code was tested both in a stand-alone UPP setup, and in a full RRFS-dev1 like deployment in my own space (in combination with small modifications to exregional_run_post.sh in the regional_workflow repository, which is a separate pull request).

@EricJames-NOAA EricJames-NOAA self-assigned this Jun 29, 2021
& '6H 50Y ARI ON surface '/
DATA IFILV(925),AVBL(925),IQ(925),IS(925),AVBLGRB2(925) &
& /1,'6H 100Y ARI EXCEDNCE',166,001, &
& '6H 100Y ARI ON surface'/
! CD and CH exchange coefficients
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This piece of the code is for grib1 but grib1 is not in UPP anymore.
So we don't need to change code in RQSTFLD.F
You can delete this part.

@hu5970
Copy link

hu5970 commented Jul 6, 2021

@EricJames-NOAA Please clean the code based on my comment and merge the code.

We can use the current code to start merge with EMC develop. But if we want to commit our code back to EMC development branch, we may need to do more work to improve the code. We can leave this when we talk about commit code back to EMC.

@EricJames-NOAA EricJames-NOAA merged commit b79dda0 into NOAA-GSL:RRFS_dev Jul 7, 2021
@EricJames-NOAA
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Thanks for the comments @hu5970 ! Yes, the code could be improved I'm sure. My focus was just to get something that works.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants