-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 11
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
V0.3.3release #30
Merged
Merged
V0.3.3release #30
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
did the last part on excel because I was lazy. Result is 32.125 years.
created simple journal for graphing energy demands
on degradation comparison
also found info on the yield of plastics
now to do recycling
finished LQ, completed HQ, but the energy is higher than the energy of manufacture...
found an extraction energy from ecoinvent from NETL 2014
for several countries supply chain related
based on analysis in Liang and You 2023
still working out emission factor, gathering from multiple places.
…ed Energy results added columns "_fuel" which calculate the fuel fraction. These are not added into "_e_demand_total" in aggregate energy results as this would double count. The fuel columns are appended to the returned energy demands df.
with the new features, tested the fuel column addition, it works, yay!
weighting each manfuacturing step by the country or vise versa to get the country contribution to each manufacturing step, which, when summed, provides the overall country contribution to mfging energy
multiplied each by the ingot energy fraction, then added.
working on creating evolving module profiles.
and graphed trends
added inputs, refined for naming, almost done with silicon mfging energy by country
need to extend mg-si data and then renormalize
with weighting for each manufacturing step.
Need to trim baselines that were not modified. Opened issue to compare baseline files
setuptools does not want dashes anymore? who knows.
LOL, the short lived ones look even worse on deployment
will attempt after reboot, saving got squirrelly
…w projection it looks EVEN worse
so many hatches
mostly changing graphs to have more dash types
and adding some energy and carbon scenarios from SSPs
adding energy and carbon stuff, rerunning degradation calc
save results to do compare between deploy?
did a overwrite error again.
for pvrw
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
No description provided.