Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add explicit support for python 3.11 and 3.12 #31

Merged
merged 6 commits into from
Nov 2, 2023
Merged

Conversation

ppinchuk
Copy link
Collaborator

Just adding GHA tests...

@codecov-commenter
Copy link

codecov-commenter commented Oct 17, 2023

Codecov Report

Attention: 2 lines in your changes are missing coverage. Please review.

Comparison is base (40dffcb) 98.13% compared to head (2ea93a8) 98.06%.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main      #31      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   98.13%   98.06%   -0.07%     
==========================================
  Files          28       28              
  Lines        2892     2897       +5     
  Branches      485      485              
==========================================
+ Hits         2838     2841       +3     
- Misses         34       35       +1     
- Partials       20       21       +1     
Flag Coverage Δ
unittests 98.06% <80.00%> (-0.07%) ⬇️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

Files Coverage Δ
gaps/status.py 99.51% <100.00%> (ø)
gaps/utilities.py 100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
gaps/version.py 100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
gaps/hpc.py 98.94% <50.00%> (-1.06%) ⬇️

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@ppinchuk ppinchuk merged commit 080f0fc into main Nov 2, 2023
12 checks passed
@ppinchuk ppinchuk deleted the pp/python_3_12 branch November 2, 2023 19:46
github-actions bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 2, 2023
Add explicit support for python 3.11 and 3.12
@ppinchuk ppinchuk linked an issue Nov 2, 2023 that may be closed by this pull request
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Better error message when allocation out of AU's
2 participants