Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

bespoke icing fixes from travis and paul #475

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Oct 18, 2024
Merged

Conversation

grantbuster
Copy link
Member

No description provided.

@codecov-commenter
Copy link

codecov-commenter commented Oct 18, 2024

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 93.18182% with 3 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 87.57%. Comparing base (5b94eb6) to head (f424975).

Files with missing lines Patch % Lines
reV/bespoke/bespoke.py 81.25% 3 Missing ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main     #475      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   87.51%   87.57%   +0.06%     
==========================================
  Files         122      122              
  Lines       18141    18198      +57     
==========================================
+ Hits        15876    15937      +61     
+ Misses       2265     2261       -4     
Flag Coverage Δ
unittests 87.57% <93.18%> (+0.06%) ⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@grantbuster grantbuster merged commit df1eee5 into main Oct 18, 2024
10 of 11 checks passed
@grantbuster grantbuster deleted the gb/bespoke_icing branch October 18, 2024 18:59
github-actions bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 18, 2024
bespoke icing fixes from travis and paul
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants