StridedMemoryView should expose access to the producer stream if possible

[leofang]

In an offline discussion it was brought to my attention that some use cases need a way to order the producer stream after the consumer one, when the work is done. (Ex: a ping pong exchange between producer/consumer in a tight loop.)

Right now, StridedMemoryView follows both DLPack and CAI and does the hand-shake (stream ordering) only once. But a second ordering can be done if the producer stream is exposed. In general, this is not considered safe (because the producer may not guarantee the stream pointer is always valid during the lifetime of a StridedMemoryView instance). However, we do have one situation that guarantees the pointer lifetime, which is when StridedMemoryView instances are created inside a @args_viewable_as_strided_memory context (WIP in #247). In this case, before the decorated function returns the producer stream is considered always valid, and by exposing it we allow users to perform such ordering before this function returns, e.g.

@args_viewable_as_strided_memory((0,))
def my_func(arr, work_stream):
    # work_stream is a "consumer" stream
    view = arr.view(work_stream.handle)
    assert isinstance(view.producer_stream, Stream)
    # ... do work on work_stream ...
    view.producer_stream.wait(work_stream)
    return

[leofang]

This is not possible with DLPack as we do not have access to the producer stream.