You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
In the SolverCoverageMap._shoot_and_bounce function, samples_tx_indices stores the indices of the transmitters corresponding to all ray samples. However, when calculating reflection and diffuse reflection, operations like updated_e_field = tf.concat([updated_e_field, ref_e_field], axis=0) actually change the order in which the rays are stored. Should samples_tx_indices be adjusted accordingly?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
In the SolverCoverageMap._shoot_and_bounce function, samples_tx_indices stores the indices of the transmitters corresponding to all ray samples. However, when calculating reflection and diffuse reflection, operations like updated_e_field = tf.concat([updated_e_field, ref_e_field], axis=0) actually change the order in which the rays are stored. Should samples_tx_indices be adjusted accordingly?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: