Fix import for type mapped union sub types

[ChristopherGustafson]

Issue

When generating code for union types in Kotlin, type mappings are not taken into consideration. This results in broken Kotlin classes.

Steps to reproduce issue

Schema:

union Pet = Cat | Dog
type Cat implements Pet {
  name: ID!
}
type Dog implements Pet {
  name: ID!
}

And an implementation of Cat

package com.example.animals.types

data class Cat(val id: String, val color: String)

And finally a typeMapping for Cat

typeMapping = [
  "Cat": "com.example.animals.types.Cat"
]

Which results in errors in the generated Animal interface that complains about the missing type Cat.

Solution

A solution to this has already been implemented in the Java equivalent generator. Follow the same pattern and lookup the full class name of each member type.

[srinivasankavitha]

Thanks for the fix!

[ChristopherGustafson]

Thanks for the merge @srinivasankavitha! When are you planning the next release?

[srinivasankavitha]

we will release early this week.

[ChristopherGustafson]

Great!