Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

pantheon.elementary-files: 6.1.1 -> 6.1.2 #156801

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jan 26, 2022
Merged

pantheon.elementary-files: 6.1.1 -> 6.1.2 #156801

merged 1 commit into from
Jan 26, 2022

Conversation

bobby285271
Copy link
Member

@bobby285271 bobby285271 commented Jan 26, 2022 •
edited
Loading

Motivation for this change

Pantheon 6.1 follow-ups (previous one at #156646)

Things done
  • Built on platform(s)
    • x86_64-linux
    • aarch64-linux
    • x86_64-darwin
    • aarch64-darwin
  • For non-Linux: Is sandbox = true set in nix.conf? (See Nix manual)
  • Tested, as applicable:
  • Tested compilation of all packages that depend on this change using nix-shell -p nixpkgs-review --run "nixpkgs-review rev HEAD". Note: all changes have to be committed, also see nixpkgs-review usage
  • Tested basic functionality of all binary files (usually in ./result/bin/)
  • 22.05 Release Notes (or backporting 21.11 Release notes)
    • (Package updates) Added a release notes entry if the change is major or breaking
    • (Module updates) Added a release notes entry if the change is significant
    • (Module addition) Added a release notes entry if adding a new NixOS module
    • (Release notes changes) Ran nixos/doc/manual/md-to-db.sh to update generated release notes
  • Fits CONTRIBUTING.md.

@github-actions github-actions bot added the 6.topic: pantheon The Pantheon desktop environment label Jan 26, 2022
@bobby285271
Copy link
Member Author

bobby285271 commented Jan 26, 2022 •
edited
Loading

The following content is machine generated and may contain invalid information.

files (6.1.1 → 6.1.2)

@bobby285271 bobby285271 added the 9.needs: port to stable A PR needs a backport to the stable release. label Jan 26, 2022
@bobby285271 bobby285271 mentioned this pull request Jan 26, 2022
Merged
13 tasks
@ofborg ofborg bot requested a review from davidak January 26, 2022 03:10
@ofborg ofborg bot added 11.by: package-maintainer This PR was created by the maintainer of the package it changes 10.rebuild-darwin: 0 This PR does not cause any packages to rebuild on Darwin 10.rebuild-linux: 1-10 labels Jan 26, 2022
@bobby285271
Copy link
Member Author

Result of nixpkgs-review pr 156801 run on x86_64-linux 1

2 packages built:
  • pantheon-tweaks
  • pantheon.elementary-files

@bobby285271
Copy link
Member Author

@ofborg test pantheon

@bobby285271 bobby285271 marked this pull request as ready for review January 26, 2022 12:08
@bobby285271 bobby285271 added the 8.has: upstream changes reviewed Reviewer checked the changelogs/commit logs associated with the release and did not find any issues. label Jan 26, 2022
@bobby285271 bobby285271 merged commit e722007 into NixOS:master Jan 26, 2022
@bobby285271 bobby285271 mentioned this pull request Jan 27, 2022
Merged
13 tasks
@bobby285271 bobby285271 added 8.has: port to stable A PR already has a backport to the stable release. and removed 9.needs: port to stable A PR needs a backport to the stable release. labels Feb 1, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@davidak davidak Awaiting requested review from davidak

Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
6.topic: pantheon The Pantheon desktop environment 8.has: port to stable A PR already has a backport to the stable release. 8.has: upstream changes reviewed Reviewer checked the changelogs/commit logs associated with the release and did not find any issues. 10.rebuild-darwin: 0 This PR does not cause any packages to rebuild on Darwin 10.rebuild-linux: 1-10 11.by: package-maintainer This PR was created by the maintainer of the package it changes
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
1 participant
@bobby285271