pommed service: Replace broken pommed package with pommed-light #21267
Conversation
Balletie
force-pushed
the
feature/pommed-light
branch
3 times, most recently
from
7bc58a3 to
96d4793
Compare
| substituteInPlace pommed.conf.mactel --replace /usr $out | ||
| substituteInPlace pommed.conf.pmac --replace /usr $out | ||
| substituteInPlace pommed/beep.h --replace /usr $out | ||
| substituteInPlace pommed/evdev.h --replace 0262 0252 |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
line 28: I added this substitution due to a personal bug that I had found (see bytbox/pommed-light#31). Once a new version with a fix is published, I will remove this line. The bug probably affects a small group of people though (those with Macbook Pro 8.2)..
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I've removed this line on second thought, since I'm not sure whether it wouldn't break things for others.
The pommed package was marked as broken. It is also severely unmaintained. I therefore chose to replace it entirely with `pommed-light`, for now.
Balletie
force-pushed
the
feature/pommed-light
branch
from
96d4793 to
8287dc2
Compare
| install -Dm644 pommed/data/click.wav $out/share/pommed/click.wav | ||
| ''; | ||
|
|
||
| meta = { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Perhaps add meta.platforms = stdenv.lib.platforms.linux.
Also, have you considered adding yourself as the maintainer?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I have, but I don't feel like taking such a responsibility at the moment.
I will add your suggestion.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Fair enough. Being listed as a maintainer primarily means that you're somebody who cares about the package and might be able to answer questions about it; beyond that, it means whatever you want it to.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Yea I understand. I don't think it's something I will commit to long term (e.g. at least half a year or so), so that's why I prefer not to list myself as maintainer. In any case the @mention-bot would just tag me by analyzing the history when there's an issue right?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I've never seen it do that for ordinary issues, but it usually works for PRs.
|
Looks pretty good to me, though I can't speak to the specifics. If nobody objects, I'll integrate this soon. |
Balletie
force-pushed
the
feature/pommed-light
branch
from
d20345e to
8ffa6c5
Compare
|
Merged. Thank you. |
Motivation for this change
The pommed package was marked as broken. It is also severely unmaintained. I therefore chose to replace it entirely with
pommed-light, for now.There are some forks of the original pommed to be found (in fact,
pommed-lightseems to be one) which aren't unmaintained. For example, Arch's AUR has a packagepommed-jalazizwhich seems to be maintained well.So we could maybe follow the same example, and add two versions of pommed in our package tree:
pommed-jalazizandpommed-light. And then we could extend the service with an option (e.g.services.hardware.pommed.package) to allow the user to select a package.Things done
(nix.useSandbox on NixOS,
or option
build-use-sandboxinnix.confon non-NixOS)
nix-shell -p nox --run "nox-review wip"./result/bin/)