xdg-utils: unstable-2020-10-21 -> unstable-2022-11-06

[colemickens]

Description of changes

I noticed a unstable-2020... in my build log so I grabbed this one too.

Updates xdg-utils to latest unstable, since they haven't tagged a release since 2018.

Things done

• Built on platform(s)
  • x86_64-linux
  • aarch64-linux
  • x86_64-darwin
  • aarch64-darwin
• For non-Linux: Is sandbox = true set in nix.conf? (See Nix manual)
• Tested, as applicable:
  • NixOS test(s) (look inside nixos/tests)
  • and/or package tests
  • or, for functions and "core" functionality, tests in lib/tests or pkgs/test
  • made sure NixOS tests are linked to the relevant packages
• Tested compilation of all packages that depend on this change using nix-shell -p nixpkgs-review --run "nixpkgs-review rev HEAD". Note: all changes have to be committed, also see nixpkgs-review usage
• Tested basic functionality of all binary files (usually in ./result/bin/)
• 23.05 Release Notes (or backporting 22.11 Release notes)
  • (Package updates) Added a release notes entry if the change is major or breaking
  • (Module updates) Added a release notes entry if the change is significant
  • (Module addition) Added a release notes entry if adding a new NixOS module
• Fits CONTRIBUTING.md.

[Tungsten842]

Duplicate of #228896

[vcunat]

The other PR seems much worse to me, though. The title and commit message, also targeting 22.11 (and even the channel branch).

[colemickens]

I do think this PR looks "more correct", but either way. Might be a good chance to help guide a future new contributor too!

[InLaw]

I'm happy if there is progress .. (without people blocking it, due to reasons not everyone could understand easily regarding its tradeoff / officialdom)

[colemickens]

I've been running with this for a few days without issue.