jankyborders: init at 1.6.0

[khaneliman]

Description of changes

https://github.com/FelixKratz/JankyBorders

Things done

• Built on platform(s)
  • x86_64-linux
  • aarch64-linux
  • x86_64-darwin
  • aarch64-darwin
• For non-Linux: Is sandboxing enabled in nix.conf? (See Nix manual)
  • sandbox = relaxed
  • sandbox = true
• Tested, as applicable:
  • NixOS test(s) (look inside nixos/tests)
  • and/or package tests
  • or, for functions and "core" functionality, tests in lib/tests or pkgs/test
  • made sure NixOS tests are linked to the relevant packages
• Tested compilation of all packages that depend on this change using nix-shell -p nixpkgs-review --run "nixpkgs-review rev HEAD". Note: all changes have to be committed, also see nixpkgs-review usage
• Tested basic functionality of all binary files (usually in ./result/bin/)
• 23.11 Release Notes (or backporting 23.05 Release notes)
  • (Package updates) Added a release notes entry if the change is major or breaking
  • (Module updates) Added a release notes entry if the change is significant
  • (Module addition) Added a release notes entry if adding a new NixOS module
• Fits CONTRIBUTING.md.

[FelixKratz]

I have not used nix before, but this error might be due to linking with an outdated version of SkyLight. The missing symbol was added in Ventura I think.

[khaneliman]

I have not used nix before, but this error might be due to linking with an outdated version of SkyLight. The missing symbol was added in Ventura I think.

This would make sense... unfortunately the sdk version we're utilizing in nixpkgs looks like just 11.0. So this might be dependent on #229210 ?

[khaneliman]

@GrahamcOfBorg build jankyborders

[khaneliman]

@GrahamcOfBorg build jankyborders

[khaneliman]

@FelixKratz looks to be building now after that symbol change, thanks for letting me know. Using it in my personal config from nix derivation, already. :)

[khaneliman]

Result of nixpkgs-review pr 268334 run on aarch64-darwin 1

1 package built:

• jankyborders