-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 14.3k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
cargo-show-asm: 0.2.25 -> 0.2.28 #281810
cargo-show-asm: 0.2.25 -> 0.2.28 #281810
Conversation
passthru test is failing on x64 linux and darwin |
Successfully created backport PR for |
Oops, sorry, I merged it by mistake.😢 |
This is the log of the
|
Test failure is caused by the same reason as this one: pacak/cargo-show-asm#231 - rustc automatically marks add as inline and doesn't include it in the output. Marking it as |
^ this should fix the test. |
Automatic update generated by nixpkgs-update tools. This update was made based on information from passthru.updateScript.
meta.description for cargo-show-asm is: Cargo subcommand showing the assembly, LLVM-IR and MIR generated for Rust code
meta.homepage for cargo-show-asm is: https://github.com/pacak/cargo-show-asm
meta.changelog for cargo-show-asm is: https://github.com/pacak/cargo-show-asm/blob/0.2.28/Changelog.md
Updates performed
To inspect upstream changes
Impact
Checks done
passthru.tests
did not passRebuild report (if merged into master) (click to expand)
Instructions to test this update (click to expand)
Either download from Cachix:
(The Cachix cache is only trusted for this store-path realization.)
For the Cachix download to work, your user must be in the
trusted-users
list or you can usesudo
since root is effectively trusted.Or, build yourself:
Or:
After you've downloaded or built it, look at the files and if there are any, run the binaries:
Pre-merge build results
We have automatically built all packages that will get rebuilt due to
this change.
This gives evidence on whether the upgrade will break dependent packages.
Note sometimes packages show up as failed to build independent of the
change, simply because they are already broken on the target branch.
Result of
nixpkgs-review
run on x86_64-linux 11 package built:
Maintainer pings
cc @figsoda @oxalica @matthiasbeyer for testing.