-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 14.4k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
zfsUnstable: 2.2.2 → 2.2.3-unstable-2024-01-22 #283730
Conversation
I'm not maintainer of ZFS 2.2.x series anymore. |
Unstable ZFS is now also compatible with Linux 6.2+ on aarch64, we could consider dropping |
I think it's still needed for ZFS 2.1.x series. |
Nope, it got backported to 2.1 too :) openzfs/zfs#15761 |
Great! |
Sounds like a separate commit by a maintainer :) |
e2e0d44
to
1e04d8f
Compare
There were patches added to the staging branch. I will continue to rebase the default branch on this until the maintainers review it. I’m not touching DRM logic branches for this merge request… I just want 6.7 support. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Tests fail, but due to a bug in the tests. I opened a PR to fix that, and will need that before this can be merged.
1e04d8f
to
6d9679f
Compare
Should have patches for 6.7 compatibility
6d9679f
to
fd12b90
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Change looks good, verified commit is on upstream zfs-2.2.3-staging branch and passed upstream CI, verified nixosTests.zfs on x86_64-linux.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Not sure why review was re-requested, but re-approving.
Accident. Sorry. I was getting the link for Matrix in hopes of a quick merge post approval. |
Should have patches for 6.7 compatibility
Description of changes
Things done
nix.conf
? (See Nix manual)sandbox = relaxed
sandbox = true
nix-shell -p nixpkgs-review --run "nixpkgs-review rev HEAD"
. Note: all changes have to be committed, also see nixpkgs-review usage./result/bin/
)Add a 👍 reaction to pull requests you find important.